IGF ranks 2nd and TOLZ 6th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
IGF vs TOLZ
IGF −0.09pt a year
0.37%0.46%
IGF 62.6×the volume
874K14K
IGF +0.4pt
+8.4%+8.0%
IGF vs TOLZ Performance
+59.2%+48.6%
- IGF 0.37%, better
- TOLZ 0.46%
- IGF $10.9B
- TOLZ $173M
- IGF +11.2%
- TOLZ +15.8%, better
- IGF 2.93%
- TOLZ 3.05%, better
- IGF 89
- TOLZ 115
- IGF 874K sh, better
- TOLZ 14K sh
- IGF $65.84
- TOLZ $59.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IGF | TOLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | A74 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | A72 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A83Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | C43 |
| Durability | A92Higher | A71 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. IGF and TOLZ are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IGFA
TOLZB
In short
IGF About 80 developed-market infrastructure companies in one ticker, tracked against the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, for 0.37% a year (well under the category norm).
TOLZ Named for toll roads, and it means it. TOLZ holds the owners and operators of infrastructure itself (airports, pipelines, cell towers, water) across developed markets, not the contractors that build it.
Stated mandate
IGF The Fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities focused on the infrastructure industry.
TOLZ The fund seeks capital appreciation and income through an actively managed portfolio of companies associated with sustainable infrastructure and the transition to a more sustainable global economy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IGF vs TOLZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IGF vs TOLZ Cost
Overpaying TOLZ vs IGF
$1,717
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IGF 0.37%
$7,513
TOLZ 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IGF | TOLZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $830 | $160 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $3,195 | $605 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $9,230 | $1,717 |
- 0.37%IGF, cheaper
- 0.46%TOLZ
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IGF 3rd cheapest of 33 funds
TOLZ 9th cheapest of 33 funds
IGF vs TOLZ Dividends
- IGF 2.93%
- TOLZ 3.05%, better
- IGF $1.93
- TOLZ $1.81
- IGF $0.93
- TOLZ $0.43
- IGF Jun 15, 2026
- TOLZ Sep 23, 2026
- IGF Jun 18, 2026
- TOLZ Sep 29, 2026
- IGF Twice a year
- TOLZ Quarterly
Distribution history
IGF vs TOLZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IGF
- TOLZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IGF 12.4%, betterTOLZ 13.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IGF 1.18, betterTOLZ 0.93
- Worst fall
- IGF −20.8%, betterTOLZ −21.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IGF 0.62TOLZ 0.49
IGF and TOLZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



