IFRA ranks 1st and TOLZ 6th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
IFRA vs TOLZ
IFRA −0.16pt a year
0.30%0.46%
IFRA 28.5×the volume
398K14K
IFRA +3.7pt
+12.2%+8.5%
IFRA vs TOLZ Performance
+77.5%+50.3%
- IFRA 0.30%, better
- TOLZ 0.46%
- IFRA $4.07B
- TOLZ $173M
- IFRA +12.7%
- TOLZ +16.5%, better
- IFRA 1.74%
- TOLZ 3.03%, better
- IFRA 165
- TOLZ 115
- IFRA 398K sh, better
- TOLZ 14K sh
- IFRA $58.33
- TOLZ $59.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IFRA | TOLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A74 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | B55 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A95Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | C43 |
| Durability | A81Higher | A71 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. IFRA and TOLZ are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IFRAA
TOLZB
In short
IFRA Most infrastructure funds pick a side: the companies that build the stuff, or the ones that own it. IFRA holds both, stays entirely American, and charges well under the category's typical fee.
TOLZ Named for toll roads, and it means it. TOLZ holds the owners and operators of infrastructure itself (airports, pipelines, cell towers, water) across developed markets, not the contractors that build it.
Stated mandate
IFRA The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies with infrastructure exposure, balancing infrastructure enablers and infrastructure asset owners.
TOLZ The fund seeks capital appreciation and income through an actively managed portfolio of companies associated with sustainable infrastructure and the transition to a more sustainable global economy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IFRA vs TOLZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IFRA vs TOLZ Cost
Overpaying TOLZ vs IFRA
$3,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IFRA 0.30%
$6,149
TOLZ 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IFRA | TOLZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $830 | $285 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,195 | $1,082 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $9,230 | $3,081 |
- 0.30%IFRA, cheaper
- 0.46%TOLZ
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IFRA cheapest of 33 funds
TOLZ 9th cheapest of 33 funds
IFRA vs TOLZ Dividends
- IFRA 1.74%
- TOLZ 3.03%, better
- IFRA $1.02
- TOLZ $1.81
- IFRA $0.26
- TOLZ $0.43
- IFRA Sep 15, 2026
- TOLZ Sep 23, 2026
- IFRA Sep 18, 2026
- TOLZ Sep 29, 2026
- IFRA Quarterly
- TOLZ Quarterly
Distribution history
IFRA vs TOLZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IFRA
- TOLZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IFRA 17.2%TOLZ 13.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IFRA 0.92TOLZ 0.93, better
- Worst fall
- IFRA −19.9%, betterTOLZ −21.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IFRA 0.96TOLZ 0.49
IFRA and TOLZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


