GII ranks 3rd and TOLZ 6th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
GII vs TOLZ
GII −0.06pt a year
0.40%0.46%
GII 3.0×the volume
41.6K14K
GII +0.5pt
+8.5%+8.0%
GII vs TOLZ Performance
+59.0%+48.6%
- GII 0.40%, better
- TOLZ 0.46%
- GII $962M
- TOLZ $173M
- GII +11.3%
- TOLZ +15.8%, better
- GII 2.69%
- TOLZ 3.05%, better
- GII 89
- TOLZ 115
- GII 41.6K sh, better
- TOLZ 14K sh
- GII $74.56
- TOLZ $59.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GII | TOLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | A74 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A72Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | C43 |
| Durability | A85Higher | A71 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. GII and TOLZ are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIIA
TOLZB
In short
GII Toll roads, airports, pipelines and power grids in one ticker. GII has tracked the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, an early entrant in the category, and charges less than the typical infrastructure fund.
TOLZ Named for toll roads, and it means it. TOLZ holds the owners and operators of infrastructure itself (airports, pipelines, cell towers, water) across developed markets, not the contractors that build it.
Stated mandate
GII The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. That index provides exposure to large publicly listed infrastructure companies across transportation, utilities, and energy infrastructure.
TOLZ The fund seeks capital appreciation and income through an actively managed portfolio of companies associated with sustainable infrastructure and the transition to a more sustainable global economy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GII vs TOLZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GII vs TOLZ Cost
Overpaying TOLZ vs GII
$1,140
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GII 0.40%
$8,090
TOLZ 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GII | TOLZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $830 | $107 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $3,195 | $402 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $9,230 | $1,140 |
- 0.40%GII, cheaper
- 0.46%TOLZ
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
GII 6th cheapest of 33 funds
TOLZ 9th cheapest of 33 funds
GII vs TOLZ Dividends
- GII 2.69%
- TOLZ 3.05%, better
- GII $2.02
- TOLZ $1.81
- GII $0.78
- TOLZ $0.43
- GII Jun 1, 2026
- TOLZ Sep 23, 2026
- GII Jun 3, 2026
- TOLZ Sep 29, 2026
- GII Twice a year
- TOLZ Quarterly
Distribution history
GII vs TOLZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GII
- TOLZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GII 12.5%, betterTOLZ 13.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GII 1.17, betterTOLZ 0.93
- Worst fall
- GII −20.7%, betterTOLZ −21.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GII 0.56TOLZ 0.49
GII and TOLZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

