IGF ranks 2nd and TPZ 30th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
IGF vs TPZ
IGF −0.48pt a year
0.37%0.85%
IGF 102.1×the volume
874K8.56K
IGF vs TPZ Performance
+11.2%+4.4%
- IGF 0.37%, better
- TPZ 0.85%
- IGF $10.9B
- TPZ $113M
- IGF +11.2%, better
- TPZ +4.4%
- IGF 2.93%
- TPZ 3.56%, better
- IGF 89
- TPZ 36
- IGF 874K sh, better
- TPZ 8.56K sh
- IGF $65.84
- TPZ $20.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IGF | TPZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F9 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A92Higher | C40 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. IGF and TPZ are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IGFA
TPZD
In short
IGF About 80 developed-market infrastructure companies in one ticker, tracked against the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, for 0.37% a year (well under the category norm).
TPZ Most infrastructure funds buy the whole board: airports, toll roads, pipelines. TPZ narrows to power and energy infrastructure with a stated emphasis on stable, defensive names. A specialist in a cohort of generalists.
Stated mandate
IGF The Fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities focused on the infrastructure industry.
TPZ The Fund seeks exposure primarily to power and energy infrastructure companies, with an emphasis on stable and defensive investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IGF vs TPZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IGF vs TPZ Cost
Overpaying TPZ vs IGF
$8,686
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IGF 0.37%
$7,513
TPZ 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IGF | TPZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $1,508 | $838 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $5,706 | $3,116 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $16,199 | $8,686 |
- 0.37%IGF, cheaper
- 0.85%TPZ
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IGF 3rd cheapest of 33 funds
TPZ 30th cheapest of 33 funds
IGF vs TPZ Dividends
- IGF 2.93%
- TPZ 3.56%, better
- IGF $1.93
- TPZ $0.75
- IGF $0.93
- TPZ $0.20
- IGF Jun 15, 2026
- TPZ Sep 24, 2026
- IGF Jun 18, 2026
- TPZ Sep 25, 2026
- IGF Twice a year
- TPZ Quarterly
Distribution history
IGF vs TPZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IGF 12.4%TPZ 14.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IGF 1.18TPZ 0.29
- Worst fall
- IGF −20.8%TPZ −17.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IGF 0.62TPZ 0.45
IGF and TPZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



