GII ranks 3rd and TPZ 30th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
GII vs TPZ
GII −0.45pt a year
0.40%0.85%
GII 4.9×the volume
41.6K8.56K
GII vs TPZ Performance
+11.3%+4.4%
- GII 0.40%, better
- TPZ 0.85%
- GII $962M
- TPZ $113M
- GII +11.3%, better
- TPZ +4.4%
- GII 2.69%
- TPZ 3.56%, better
- GII 89
- TPZ 36
- GII 41.6K sh, better
- TPZ 8.56K sh
- GII $74.56
- TPZ $20.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GII | TPZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | F9 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A72Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A85Higher | C40 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. GII and TPZ are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIIA
TPZD
In short
GII Toll roads, airports, pipelines and power grids in one ticker. GII has tracked the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, an early entrant in the category, and charges less than the typical infrastructure fund.
TPZ Most infrastructure funds buy the whole board: airports, toll roads, pipelines. TPZ narrows to power and energy infrastructure with a stated emphasis on stable, defensive names. A specialist in a cohort of generalists.
Stated mandate
GII The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. That index provides exposure to large publicly listed infrastructure companies across transportation, utilities, and energy infrastructure.
TPZ The Fund seeks exposure primarily to power and energy infrastructure companies, with an emphasis on stable and defensive investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GII vs TPZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GII vs TPZ Cost
Overpaying TPZ vs GII
$8,109
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GII 0.40%
$8,090
TPZ 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GII | TPZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $1,508 | $785 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $5,706 | $2,913 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $16,199 | $8,109 |
- 0.40%GII, cheaper
- 0.85%TPZ
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
GII 6th cheapest of 33 funds
TPZ 30th cheapest of 33 funds
GII vs TPZ Dividends
- GII 2.69%
- TPZ 3.56%, better
- GII $2.02
- TPZ $0.75
- GII $0.78
- TPZ $0.20
- GII Jun 1, 2026
- TPZ Sep 24, 2026
- GII Jun 3, 2026
- TPZ Sep 25, 2026
- GII Twice a year
- TPZ Quarterly
Distribution history
GII vs TPZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GII 12.5%TPZ 14.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GII 1.17TPZ 0.29
- Worst fall
- GII −20.7%TPZ −17.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GII 0.56TPZ 0.45
GII and TPZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

