IFRA ranks 1st and TPZ 30th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
IFRA vs TPZ
IFRA −0.55pt a year
0.30%0.85%
IFRA 46.5×the volume
398K8.56K
IFRA vs TPZ Performance
+13.4%+4.4%
- IFRA 0.30%, better
- TPZ 0.85%
- IFRA $4.07B
- TPZ $113M
- IFRA +13.4%, better
- TPZ +4.4%
- IFRA 1.73%
- TPZ 3.56%, better
- IFRA 165
- TPZ 36
- IFRA 398K sh, better
- TPZ 8.56K sh
- IFRA $58.33
- TPZ $20.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IFRA | TPZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F9 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | B55Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A95Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A81Higher | C40 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. IFRA and TPZ are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IFRAA
TPZD
In short
IFRA Most infrastructure funds pick a side: the companies that build the stuff, or the ones that own it. IFRA holds both, stays entirely American, and charges well under the category's typical fee.
TPZ Most infrastructure funds buy the whole board: airports, toll roads, pipelines. TPZ narrows to power and energy infrastructure with a stated emphasis on stable, defensive names. A specialist in a cohort of generalists.
Stated mandate
IFRA The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies with infrastructure exposure, balancing infrastructure enablers and infrastructure asset owners.
TPZ The Fund seeks exposure primarily to power and energy infrastructure companies, with an emphasis on stable and defensive investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IFRA vs TPZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IFRA vs TPZ Cost
Overpaying TPZ vs IFRA
$10,050
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IFRA 0.30%
$6,149
TPZ 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IFRA | TPZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,508 | $963 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,706 | $3,593 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $16,199 | $10,050 |
- 0.30%IFRA, cheaper
- 0.85%TPZ
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IFRA cheapest of 33 funds
TPZ 30th cheapest of 33 funds
IFRA vs TPZ Dividends
- IFRA 1.73%
- TPZ 3.56%, better
- IFRA $1.02
- TPZ $0.75
- IFRA $0.26
- TPZ $0.20
- IFRA Sep 15, 2026
- TPZ Sep 24, 2026
- IFRA Sep 18, 2026
- TPZ Sep 25, 2026
- IFRA Quarterly
- TPZ Quarterly
Distribution history
IFRA vs TPZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IFRA 17.2%TPZ 14.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IFRA 0.92TPZ 0.29
- Worst fall
- IFRA −19.9%TPZ −17.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IFRA 0.96TPZ 0.45
IFRA and TPZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


