ILCG ranks 2nd and IVW 12th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
ILCG vs IVW
ILCG −0.14pt a year
0.04%0.18%
IVW 23.7×the volume
70.4K1.67M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+17.3%+17.3%
ILCG vs IVW Performance
+59.5%+72.2%
- ILCG 0.04%, better
- IVW 0.18%
- ILCG $3B
- IVW $74.7B
- ILCG +3.2%
- IVW +8.2%, better
- ILCG 0.44%, better
- IVW 0.36%
- ILCG 328
- IVW 154
- ILCG 70.4K sh
- IVW 1.67M sh, better
- ILCG $109.98
- IVW $134.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCG | IVW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | C49 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A98 |
| Risk | C44 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | C49Higher | D37 |
| Durability | B64 | A84Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. ILCG and IVW are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCGA
IVWB
In short
ILCG Growth by Morningstar's rulebook. A 2004-vintage iShares fund that screens large and mid caps for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow and book-value growth, and charges four basis points to do it.
IVW The 2000-vintage original for S&P 500 growth exposure: roughly 150 large caps chosen by a three-factor rules screen, cap-weighted, no manager discretion. Big and liquid, though cheaper trackers of the same benchmark now exist.
Stated mandate
ILCG The fund aims to follow an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks chosen for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow, and book-value growth.
IVW The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large-cap stocks exhibiting strong growth characteristics, selected using measures including earnings and revenue growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCG vs IVW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCG vs IVW Cost
Overpaying IVW vs ILCG
$2,900
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCG 0.04%
$849
IVW 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCG | IVW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $328 | $255 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,281 | $993 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,749 | $2,900 |
- 0.04%ILCG, cheaper
- 0.18%IVW
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
ILCG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
IVW 17th cheapest of 35 funds
ILCG vs IVW Dividends
- ILCG 0.44%, better
- IVW 0.36%
- ILCG $0.48
- IVW $0.49
- ILCG $0.14
- IVW $0.13
- ILCG Sep 15, 2026
- IVW Sep 15, 2026
- ILCG Sep 18, 2026
- IVW Sep 18, 2026
- ILCG Quarterly
- IVW Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCG vs IVW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCG
- IVW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCG 17.8%IVW 16.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCG 1.06IVW 1.27, better
- Worst fall
- ILCG −35.4%IVW −32.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ILCG 1.23IVW 1.17
ILCG and IVW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


