IMCG ranks 2nd and IVW 12th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs IVW
IMCG −0.12pt a year
0.06%0.18%
IVW 12.6×the volume
132K1.67M
IVW +3.0pt
+14.3%+17.3%
IMCG vs IVW Performance
+30.8%+72.2%
- IMCG 0.06%, better
- IVW 0.18%
- IMCG $4.04B
- IVW $74.7B
- IMCG +14.0%, better
- IVW +8.2%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- IVW 0.36%
- IMCG 262
- IVW 154
- IMCG 132K sh
- IVW 1.67M sh, better
- IMCG $93.24
- IVW $134.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | IVW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | C49 |
| Mission | A95 | A98Higher |
| Risk | A78Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | B61 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | A75Higher | D37 |
| Durability | B66 | A84Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and IVW are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
IVWB
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
IVW The 2000-vintage original for S&P 500 growth exposure: roughly 150 large caps chosen by a three-factor rules screen, cap-weighted, no manager discretion. Big and liquid, though cheaper trackers of the same benchmark now exist.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
IVW The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large-cap stocks exhibiting strong growth characteristics, selected using measures including earnings and revenue growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs IVW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs IVW Cost
Overpaying IVW vs IMCG
$2,479
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
IVW 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | IVW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $328 | $218 |
| 20 | $432 | $1,281 | $849 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $3,749 | $2,479 |
- 0.06%IMCG, cheaper
- 0.18%IVW
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
IVW 17th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG vs IVW Dividends
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- IVW 0.36%
- IMCG $0.62
- IVW $0.49
- IMCG $0.19
- IVW $0.13
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- IVW Sep 15, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- IVW Sep 18, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- IVW Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs IVW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCG
- IVW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 16.6%IVW 16.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.97IVW 1.27, better
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%IVW −32.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14IVW 1.17
IMCG and IVW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


