ILCG ranks 2nd and IWF 14th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
ILCG vs IWF
ILCG −0.14pt a year
0.04%0.18%
IWF 64.1×the volume
70.4K4.51M
IWF +0.2pt
+17.3%+17.5%
ILCG vs IWF Performance
+59.5%+62.2%
- ILCG 0.04%, better
- IWF 0.18%
- ILCG $3B
- IWF $120B
- ILCG +3.2%, better
- IWF −2.8%
- ILCG 0.44%, better
- IWF 0.37%
- ILCG 328
- IWF 375
- ILCG 70.4K sh
- IWF 4.51M sh, better
- ILCG $109.98
- IWF $117.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCG | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | C49 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C44Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | B64 | A96Higher |
| Holdings | C49Higher | C43 |
| Durability | B64 | A86Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. ILCG and IWF are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCGA
IWFB
In short
ILCG Growth by Morningstar's rulebook. A 2004-vintage iShares fund that screens large and mid caps for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow and book-value growth, and charges four basis points to do it.
IWF Trading since 2000, IWF is the heavyweight way to own the Russell 1000 Growth Index: roughly 400 US large- and mid-cap growth names, in one of the biggest and busiest funds in its group. Cheaper clones of the same index exist.
Stated mandate
ILCG The fund aims to follow an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks chosen for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow, and book-value growth.
IWF The Fund seeks to follow the Russell 1000 Growth Index, representing U.S. large- and mid-capitalization equities selected for growth characteristics. It generally invests at least 80% of assets in index components.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCG vs IWF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCG vs IWF Cost
Overpaying IWF vs ILCG
$2,900
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCG 0.04%
$849
IWF 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCG | IWF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $328 | $255 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,281 | $993 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,749 | $2,900 |
- 0.04%ILCG, cheaper
- 0.18%IWF
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
ILCG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
IWF 17th cheapest of 35 funds
ILCG vs IWF Dividends
- ILCG 0.44%, better
- IWF 0.37%
- ILCG $0.48
- IWF $0.43
- ILCG $0.14
- IWF $0.11
- ILCG Sep 15, 2026
- IWF Sep 15, 2026
- ILCG Sep 18, 2026
- IWF Sep 18, 2026
- ILCG Quarterly
- IWF Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCG vs IWF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCG
- IWF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCG 17.8%IWF 16.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCG 1.06, betterIWF 1.01
- Worst fall
- ILCG −35.4%IWF −32.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ILCG 1.23IWF 1.17
ILCG and IWF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





