Skip to content

IMCG vs IWF

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

IMCGANYSE Arca

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

IWFBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

IMCG −0.12pt a year

IMCG0.06%IWF0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

IWF 34.1×the volume

IMCG132KIWF4.51M

10Y return · a year

IWF +3.2pt

IMCG+14.3%IWF+17.5%

IMCG vs IWF Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+30.8%IMCG+62.2%IWF

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. IMCG +30.8%. IWF +62.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%80%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IMCG 0.06%, better
IWF 0.18%
Fund size
IMCG $4.04B
IWF $120B
1Y total return
IMCG +14.0%, better
IWF −2.8%
Yield (12M)
IMCG 0.67%, better
IWF 0.37%
Holdings
IMCG 262
IWF 375
Avg volume (30D)
IMCG 132K sh
IWF 4.51M sh, better
NAV per share
IMCG $93.24
IWF $117.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IMCG: Cost 78, Risk 78, Mission 95, Tradability 61, Holdings 75, Durability 66. IWF: Cost 49, Risk 29, Mission 100, Tradability 96, Holdings 43, Durability 86.
Pillar letters and Scores for IMCG, IWF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIMCGIWF
Cost30% weightA78HigherC49
Mission25% weightA95A100Higher
Risk15% weightA78HigherD29
Tradability15% weightB61A96Higher
Holdings10% weightA75HigherC43
Durability5% weightB66A86Higher

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IMCG and IWF are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

IMCG ranks 2nd and IWF 14th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 2ASCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  5. Rank 12BVOOGVanguard S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 67
  6. Rank 14BIWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETFScore 66
  7. Rank 14BVTWGVanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETFScore 66

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IMCGAiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

IWFBiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

In short

IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.

IWF Trading since 2000, IWF is the heavyweight way to own the Russell 1000 Growth Index: roughly 400 US large- and mid-cap growth names, in one of the biggest and busiest funds in its group. Cheaper clones of the same index exist.

Stated mandate

IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.

IWF The Fund seeks to follow the Russell 1000 Growth Index, representing U.S. large- and mid-capitalization equities selected for growth characteristics. It generally invests at least 80% of assets in index components.

Why people hold it

  • IMCG 0.06% a year, one third of the 0.18% median for its growth-fund peer group. Mid-cap indexing at large-cap-index prices.
  • The growth leaderboard is stacked with large-cap funds (VUG, SCHG, SPYG, VONG). IMCG covers the middle instead, holding about 300 mid-cap growth names.
  • Sticks close to the Morningstar mid-cap growth index it follows, one of the tighter tracking jobs in its peer group.
  • Running since 2004 under the iShares roof, with a multi-billion-dollar asset base behind it.
  • IWF Running since 2000 and now among the largest and most actively traded growth ETFs, so getting in and out rarely means fighting a wide spread.
  • The mandate is plain: follow the Russell 1000 Growth Index, at least 80% in index components. Its index tracking measures among the tightest in its peer group.ishares.com
  • One ticker buys about 400 US large- and mid-cap stocks selected for growth characteristics, with cash paid out quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • IMCG Moderately traded rather than heavily traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the megacap growth ETFs sitting beside it in the category.
  • This is a size-and-style bet. Mid-cap growth companies tend to move more sharply than the broad market, in both directions.
  • Distributions land quarterly, but a growth screen is not built around income.
  • IWF The 0.18% fee sits mid-pack for growth ETFs, and VONG follows the identical Russell 1000 Growth Index for a fraction of it. Same index, different sticker.
  • A growth screen keeps only part of the Russell 1000, so the ride depends on whichever names the index currently counts as fast growers.

Full IMCG profile⁠

Full IWF profile⁠

IMCG vs IWF Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IMCG vs IWF Cost

Overpaying IWF vs IMCG

$2,479

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IMCG 0.06%

    $1,270

  • IWF 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IMCG 0.06%
  • IWF 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K051015202530IWF $3,749IMCG $1,270

Year by year

YearIMCGIWFOverpaying
10$110$328$218
20$432$1,281$849
30$1,270$3,749$2,479

Expense ratio

  • 0.06%IMCG, cheaper
  • 0.18%IWF
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds

IWF 17th cheapest of 35 funds

IMCG vs IWF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IMCG 0.67%, better
IWF 0.37%
Payout (12M)
IMCG $0.62
IWF $0.43
Last payment
IMCG $0.19
IWF $0.11
Ex-dividend
IMCG Sep 15, 2026
IWF Sep 15, 2026
Paid on
IMCG Sep 18, 2026
IWF Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
IMCG Quarterly
IWF Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IMCGQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IMCG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.03; Jun 27, 2017 $0.03; Sep 26, 2017 $0.05; Dec 19, 2017 $0.04; Mar 22, 2018 $0.03; Jun 26, 2018 $0.03; Sep 26, 2018 $0.02; Dec 17, 2018 $0.03; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 17, 2019 $0.02; Sep 24, 2019 $0.02; Dec 16, 2019 $0.07; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Jun 15, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.01; Dec 14, 2020 $0.0067; Mar 25, 2021 $0.0083; Jun 10, 2021 $0.08; Sep 24, 2021 $0.10; Dec 13, 2021 $0.11; Mar 24, 2022 $0.10; Jun 9, 2022 $0.08; Sep 26, 2022 $0.14; Dec 13, 2022 $0.18; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Jun 7, 2023 $0.09; Sep 26, 2023 $0.15; Dec 20, 2023 $0.18; Mar 21, 2024 $0.13; Jun 11, 2024 $0.11; Sep 25, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.17; Mar 18, 2025 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.14; Sep 16, 2025 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $0.21; Mar 17, 2026 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.10; Sep 15, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
IWFQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IWF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.08; Jul 6, 2017 $0.11; Sep 26, 2017 $0.09; Dec 21, 2017 $0.09; Mar 22, 2018 $0.10; Jul 3, 2018 $0.11; Sep 26, 2018 $0.11; Dec 17, 2018 $0.09; Dec 28, 2018 $0.0062; Mar 20, 2019 $0.11; Jun 17, 2019 $0.11; Sep 24, 2019 $0.11; Dec 16, 2019 $0.11; Mar 25, 2020 $0.11; Jun 15, 2020 $0.09; Sep 23, 2020 $0.11; Dec 14, 2020 $0.09; Mar 25, 2021 $0.09; Jun 10, 2021 $0.08; Sep 24, 2021 $0.11; Dec 13, 2021 $0.10; Mar 24, 2022 $0.10; Jun 9, 2022 $0.10; Sep 26, 2022 $0.15; Dec 13, 2022 $0.14; Mar 23, 2023 $0.13; Jun 7, 2023 $0.10; Sep 26, 2023 $0.13; Mar 21, 2024 $0.11; Jun 11, 2024 $0.10; Sep 25, 2024 $0.14; Dec 17, 2024 $0.11; Mar 18, 2025 $0.10; Jun 16, 2025 $0.10; Sep 16, 2025 $0.11; Dec 16, 2025 $0.12; Mar 17, 2026 $0.10; Jun 15, 2026 $0.11; Sep 15, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD

IMCG vs IWF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IMCG
  • IWF
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: IMCG −35.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IMCG 16.6%, betterIWF 16.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IMCG 0.97IWF 1.01, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IMCG −35.1%IWF −32.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IMCG 1.14IWF 1.17

IMCG and IWF in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IMCGAvsSPYGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IWFBvsSPYGA

    iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsILCGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IWFBvsILCGA

    iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsSCHGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IWFBvsSCHGA

    iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.