SPYG ranks 1st and IWF 14th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IWF vs SPYG
SPYG −0.14pt a year
0.18%0.04%
IWF 2.0×the volume
4.51M2.28M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+17.5%+17.5%
IWF vs SPYG Performance
+62.2%+73.4%
- IWF 0.18%
- SPYG 0.04%, better
- IWF $120B
- SPYG $55.5B
- IWF −2.8%
- SPYG +8.3%, better
- IWF 0.37%
- SPYG 0.50%, better
- IWF 375
- SPYG 154
- IWF 4.51M sh, better
- SPYG 2.28M sh
- IWF $117.59
- SPYG $119.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWF | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C49 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A98 |
| Risk | D29 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | A95 |
| Holdings | C43Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A86Higher | A79 |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IWF and SPYG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWFB
SPYGA
In short
IWF Trading since 2000, IWF is the heavyweight way to own the Russell 1000 Growth Index: roughly 400 US large- and mid-cap growth names, in one of the biggest and busiest funds in its group. Cheaper clones of the same index exist.
SPYG The growth half of the S&P 500 for 0.04% a year, running since 2000. No exotic screen, no reinvention: just the index's fastest-growing names, in the cheapest wrapper tracking that index.
Stated mandate
IWF The Fund seeks to follow the Russell 1000 Growth Index, representing U.S. large- and mid-capitalization equities selected for growth characteristics. It generally invests at least 80% of assets in index components.
SPYG The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It provides exposure to S&P 500 companies selected for strong growth characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWF vs SPYG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWF vs SPYG Cost
Overpaying IWF vs SPYG
$2,900
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWF 0.18%
$3,749
SPYG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWF | SPYG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $73 | $255 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $288 | $993 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $849 | $2,900 |
- 0.18%IWF
- 0.04%SPYG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SPYG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
IWF 17th cheapest of 35 funds
IWF vs SPYG Dividends
- IWF 0.37%
- SPYG 0.50%, better
- IWF $0.43
- SPYG $0.59
- IWF $0.11
- SPYG $0.15
- IWF Sep 15, 2026
- SPYG Sep 21, 2026
- IWF Sep 18, 2026
- SPYG Sep 23, 2026
- IWF Quarterly
- SPYG Quarterly
Distribution history
IWF vs SPYG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IWF
- SPYG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWF 16.8%SPYG 16.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IWF 1.01SPYG 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- IWF −32.7%SPYG −32.7%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- IWF 1.17SPYG 1.17Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
IWF and SPYG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





