ILIT ranks 2nd and NIKL 12th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
ILIT vs NIKL
ILIT −0.28pt a year
0.47%0.75%
NIKL 4.5×the volume
12.1K54.6K
NIKL +2.6pt
−10.9%−8.3%
ILIT vs NIKL Performance
−26.3%−24.7%
- ILIT 0.47%, better
- NIKL 0.75%
- ILIT $10M
- NIKL $39M
- ILIT −26.3%
- NIKL −24.7%, better
- ILIT 3.22%
- NIKL 3.80%, better
- ILIT 54
- NIKL 27
- ILIT 12.1K sh
- NIKL 54.6K sh, better
- ILIT $10.05
- NIKL $10.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILIT | NIKL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F14 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D27 | D37Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | C40 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | D25 |
| Durability | C43Higher | C42 |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. ILIT and NIKL are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILITB
NIKLF
In short
ILIT Most lithium funds blend miners with EV makers and battery tech. ILIT stays at the source: an index of global companies whose main business is digging lithium ore or making lithium compounds, about 40 names, for 0.47% a year.
NIKL Nickel is the metal stainless steel and battery cathodes run on, and NIKL is the only US ETF built purely on the companies digging it. One metal, roughly two dozen global miners, no diversified-mining cushion.
Stated mandate
ILIT ILIT aims to replicate an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issuers whose principal activities are lithium-ore mining or lithium-compound manufacturing.
NIKL NIKL is designed to deliver returns broadly corresponding to the Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILIT vs NIKL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILIT vs NIKL Cost
Overpaying NIKL vs ILIT
$5,064
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILIT 0.47%
$9,418
NIKL 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILIT | NIKL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $1,336 | $489 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $5,078 | $1,817 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $14,482 | $5,064 |
- 0.47%ILIT, cheaper
- 0.75%NIKL
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
ILIT cheapest of 12 funds
NIKL 11th cheapest of 12 funds
ILIT vs NIKL Dividends
- ILIT 3.22%
- NIKL 3.80%, better
- ILIT $0.32
- NIKL $0.40
- ILIT $0.02
- NIKL $0.40
- ILIT Jun 15, 2026
- NIKL Dec 18, 2025
- ILIT Jun 18, 2026
- NIKL Dec 22, 2025
- ILIT Twice a year
- NIKL Annual
Distribution history
ILIT vs NIKL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILIT 46.6%NIKL 36.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ILIT −0.11, betterNIKL −0.17
- Worst fall
- ILIT −73.7%NIKL −60.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ILIT 1.58NIKL 1.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.