REMX ranks 1st and NIKL 12th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
NIKL vs REMX
REMX −0.22pt a year
0.75%0.53%
REMX 13.4×the volume
54.6K731K
REMX +5.2pt
−8.3%−3.1%
NIKL vs REMX Performance
−24.7%−27.9%
- NIKL 0.75%
- REMX 0.53%, better
- NIKL $39M
- REMX $1.45B
- NIKL −24.7%, better
- REMX −27.9%
- NIKL 3.80%, better
- REMX 2.60%
- NIKL 27
- REMX 36
- NIKL 54.6K sh
- REMX 731K sh, better
- NIKL $10.63
- REMX $50.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NIKL | REMX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | A89Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D37Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | C40 | A94Higher |
| Holdings | D25 | B60Higher |
| Durability | C42 | A89Higher |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. NIKL and REMX are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NIKLF
REMXA
In short
NIKL Nickel is the metal stainless steel and battery cathodes run on, and NIKL is the only US ETF built purely on the companies digging it. One metal, roughly two dozen global miners, no diversified-mining cushion.
REMX The original rare earths ETF. Trading since 2010, it holds roughly 30 miners, refiners and recyclers of the metals behind magnets, EV motors and defense hardware, in one concentrated global basket priced under most of its critical-materials rivals.
Stated mandate
NIKL NIKL is designed to deliver returns broadly corresponding to the Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index before fees and expenses.
REMX The fund seeks global exposure to companies involved in producing, refining, and recycling rare earth and strategic metals and minerals, while tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NIKL vs REMX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NIKL vs REMX Cost
Overpaying NIKL vs REMX
$3,946
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NIKL 0.75%
$14,482
REMX 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NIKL | REMX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $953 | $383 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,658 | $1,420 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $10,536 | $3,946 |
- 0.75%NIKL
- 0.53%REMX, cheaper
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
REMX 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
NIKL 11th cheapest of 12 funds
NIKL vs REMX Dividends
- NIKL 3.80%, better
- REMX 2.60%
- NIKL $0.40
- REMX $1.30
- NIKL $0.40
- REMX $1.30
- NIKL Dec 18, 2025
- REMX Dec 22, 2025
- NIKL Dec 22, 2025
- REMX Dec 26, 2025
- NIKL Annual
- REMX Annual
Distribution history
NIKL vs REMX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NIKL 36.8%, betterREMX 45.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- NIKL −0.17REMX 0.06, better
- Worst fall
- NIKL −60.4%REMX −73.3%
- Market sensitivity
- NIKL 1.10REMX 1.54
NIKL and REMX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




