Skip to content

NIKL vs REMX

Sprott Nickel Miners ETF

NIKLFNasdaq

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

REMXANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

REMX −0.22pt a year

NIKL0.75%REMX0.53%

Avg volume · 30D

REMX 13.4×the volume

NIKL54.6KREMX731K

3Y return · a year

REMX +5.2pt

NIKL−8.3%REMX−3.1%

NIKL vs REMX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−24.7%NIKL−27.9%REMX

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. NIKL −24.7%. REMX −27.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NIKL 0.75%
REMX 0.53%, better
Fund size
NIKL $39M
REMX $1.45B
1Y total return
NIKL −24.7%, better
REMX −27.9%
Yield (12M)
NIKL 3.80%, better
REMX 2.60%
Holdings
NIKL 27
REMX 36
Avg volume (30D)
NIKL 54.6K sh
REMX 731K sh, better
NAV per share
NIKL $10.63
REMX $50.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NIKL: Cost 14, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 40, Holdings 25, Durability 42. REMX: Cost 89, Risk 33, Mission not scored, Tradability 94, Holdings 60, Durability 89.
Pillar letters and Scores for NIKL, REMX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNIKLREMX
Cost30% weightF14A89Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD37HigherD33
Tradability15% weightC40A94Higher
Holdings10% weightD25B60Higher
Durability5% weightC42A89Higher

Rank among Critical Materials funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NIKL and REMX are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Critical Materials⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

REMX ranks 1st and NIKL 12th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.

  1. Rank 1AREMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2BILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETFScore 64
  3. Rank 11DLITPSprott Lithium Miners ETFScore 34
  4. Rank 12FNIKLSprott Nickel Miners ETFScore 27

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NIKLFSprott Nickel Miners ETF

REMXAVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

In short

NIKL Nickel is the metal stainless steel and battery cathodes run on, and NIKL is the only US ETF built purely on the companies digging it. One metal, roughly two dozen global miners, no diversified-mining cushion.

REMX The original rare earths ETF. Trading since 2010, it holds roughly 30 miners, refiners and recyclers of the metals behind magnets, EV motors and defense hardware, in one concentrated global basket priced under most of its critical-materials rivals.

Stated mandate

NIKL NIKL is designed to deliver returns broadly corresponding to the Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index before fees and expenses.

REMX The fund seeks global exposure to companies involved in producing, refining, and recycling rare earth and strategic metals and minerals, while tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • NIKL The only US ETF focused on nickel miners. Broad battery-metals funds bury nickel among lithium and cobalt names; this one keeps the exposure to a single metal.sprottetfs.com
  • The Nasdaq Sprott index spans nickel producers, developers and explorers, and the fund normally holds at least 80% of assets in index securities, so the pure-play design is written into the rules.sprottetfs.comsprottetfs.com 2
  • Sprott's whole shelf is mining. Nickel sits beside sibling single-metal miner funds and a broader critical-materials basket (SETM), so you can dial exposure narrow or wide within one house.sprottetfs.com
  • REMX Launched in 2010, it is the elder statesman of rare earth funds, and its mandate spans producers, refiners and recyclers worldwide rather than one link in the chain.
  • Fee of 0.53% a year undercuts Global X's EART (0.59%) and Sprott's SETM (0.65%), and sits below the median for its critical-materials peer group.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, which matters in a corner of the market where the underlying stocks are thin.
  • Rules-based, not discretionary: the basket follows the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, so holdings are set by published index rules.

Worth knowing

  • NIKL At 0.75%, the fee sits above the norm for critical-materials funds and roughly double a diversified miners option like PICK at 0.39%. Narrow focus costs money.
  • Around 26 mostly international miners, explorers and developers included. One commodity's price swings drive the whole portfolio, with no other metals to soften the ride.sprottetfs.com
  • Cash comes back once or twice a year, not monthly, and the fund only launched in 2023, so the live record is short by design.
  • REMX About 30 holdings means one company's news can move the whole fund. This is a focused bet on a single supply chain, not a diversified materials sleeve.
  • Mining and refining shares move with commodity prices, so swings here run deeper and faster than in a broad equity fund.
  • Distributions arrive annually or semiannually, so cash flow is lumpy rather than a steady drip.

Full NIKL profile⁠

Full REMX profile⁠

NIKL vs REMX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NIKL vs REMX Cost

Overpaying NIKL vs REMX

$3,946

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NIKL 0.75%

    $14,482

  • REMX 0.53%

    $10,536

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NIKL 0.75%
  • REMX 0.53%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530NIKL $14,482REMX $10,536

Year by year

YearNIKLREMXOverpaying
10$1,336$953$383
20$5,078$3,658$1,420
30$14,482$10,536$3,946

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%NIKL
  • 0.53%REMX, cheaper
  • Middle half of Critical Materials funds
  • Median 0.64%

REMX 2nd cheapest of 12 funds

NIKL 11th cheapest of 12 funds

NIKL vs REMX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
NIKL 3.80%, better
REMX 2.60%
Payout (12M)
NIKL $0.40
REMX $1.30
Last payment
NIKL $0.40
REMX $1.30
Ex-dividend
NIKL Dec 18, 2025
REMX Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
NIKL Dec 22, 2025
REMX Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
NIKL Annual
REMX Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

NIKLAnnual · 3 paymentsAll NIKL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 14, 2023 $2.77; Dec 12, 2024 $0.37; Dec 18, 2025 $0.40. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
REMXAnnual · 8 paymentsAll REMX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $2.61; Dec 20, 2018 $5.06; Dec 23, 2019 $0.65; Dec 21, 2020 $0.53; Dec 20, 2021 $5.89; Dec 19, 2022 $1.19; Dec 23, 2024 $1.00; Dec 22, 2025 $1.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

NIKL vs REMX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NIKL 36.8%, betterREMX 45.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NIKL −0.17REMX 0.06, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NIKL −60.4%since Mar 2023REMX −73.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NIKL 1.10REMX 1.54

NIKL and REMX in the news

Popular comparisons

  • NIKLFvsILITB

    Sprott Nickel Miners ETF · iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REMXAvsILITB

    VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF · iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NIKLFvsEARTB

    Sprott Nickel Miners ETF · Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REMXAvsEARTB

    VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF · Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NIKLFvsSETMC

    Sprott Nickel Miners ETF · Sprott Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REMXAvsSETMC

    VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF · Sprott Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.