EART ranks 3rd and NIKL 12th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
EART vs NIKL
EART −0.16pt a year
0.59%0.75%
NIKL 3.2×the volume
17.1K54.6K
EART vs NIKL Performance
−12.9%−18.5%
- EART 0.59%, better
- NIKL 0.75%
- EART $41M
- NIKL $39M
- EART
- NIKL −24.7%
- EART 0.79%
- NIKL 3.80%, better
- EART 55
- NIKL 27
- EART 17.1K sh
- NIKL 54.6K sh, better
- EART $24.00
- NIKL $10.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EART | NIKL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69Higher | F14 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | C45Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | D25 |
| Durability | A70Higher | C42 |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. EART and NIKL are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EARTB
NIKLF
In short
EART Rare earths are the headline, but the basket runs wider: ten critical-material categories, from copper and lithium to cobalt and carbon fiber, screened so miners must earn at least half their revenue from the stuff.
NIKL Nickel is the metal stainless steel and battery cathodes run on, and NIKL is the only US ETF built purely on the companies digging it. One metal, roughly two dozen global miners, no diversified-mining cushion.
Stated mandate
EART The fund seeks exposure to companies producing rare-earth components, metals, and other raw or composite materials needed for expanding critical technologies, including electric vehicles, energy storage, robotics, and radar systems.
NIKL NIKL is designed to deliver returns broadly corresponding to the Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EART vs NIKL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EART vs NIKL Cost
Overpaying NIKL vs EART
$2,847
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EART 0.59%
$11,635
NIKL 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EART | NIKL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,336 | $278 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $5,078 | $1,027 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $14,482 | $2,847 |
- 0.59%EART, cheaper
- 0.75%NIKL
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
EART 5th cheapest of 12 funds
NIKL 11th cheapest of 12 funds
EART vs NIKL Dividends
- EART 0.79%
- NIKL 3.80%, better
- EART $0.19
- NIKL $0.40
- EART $0.14
- NIKL $0.40
- EART Jun 29, 2026
- NIKL Dec 18, 2025
- EART Jul 7, 2026
- NIKL Dec 22, 2025
- EART Twice a year
- NIKL Annual
Distribution history
EART vs NIKL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EART NIKL 36.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- EART NIKL −0.17
- Worst fall
- EART NIKL −60.4%
- Market sensitivity
- EART 1.29NIKL 1.10
EART and NIKL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
