IMCG ranks 2nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs SPYM
SPYM −0.04pt a year
0.06%0.02%
SPYM 92.3×the volume
131K12.1M
SPYM +1.2pt
+14.5%+15.7%
IMCG vs SPYM Performance
+34.1%+80.7%
- IMCG 0.06%
- SPYM 0.02%, better
- IMCG $4.11B
- SPYM $183B
- IMCG +15.4%, better
- SPYM +13.7%
- IMCG 0.65%
- SPYM 1.00%, better
- IMCG 262
- SPYM 508
- IMCG 131K sh
- SPYM 12.1M sh, better
- IMCG $95.12
- SPYM $90.06
ETF.net Grade
No winner tick: these funds sit in different Categories, and each Score ranks a fund only inside its own Category.
| Pillar | IMCG | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A99 |
| Mission | A95 | A100 |
| Risk | A74 | C51 |
| Tradability | B62 | A72 |
| Holdings | A75 | B57 |
| Durability | B66 | A79 |
Where each fund ranks
Different Categories. Their Grades do not compare head to head.
SPYM ranks 1st of 14 funds in the S&P 500 Category.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
SPYMA
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
SPYM State Street's budget-priced S&P 500 tracker: the same 500 large caps as its famous sibling, for 0.02% a year, the lowest fee in its S&P 500 peer group. Running since 2005 and now one of the category's giants.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
SPYM The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P 500 Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S. large-cap equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs SPYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs SPYM Cost
Overpaying IMCG vs SPYM
$844
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
SPYM 0.02%
$426
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | SPYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $37 | $73 |
| 20 | $432 | $144 | $288 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $426 | $844 |
- 0.06%IMCG
- 0.02%SPYM, cheaper
Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.Different Categories, so each fee sits in its own Category’s range.
IMCG among 35 US Growth Index funds
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
SPYM among 14 S&P 500 funds
- Middle half of S&P 500 funds
- Median 0.09%
SPYM cheapest of 14 funds
IMCG vs SPYM Dividends
- IMCG 0.65%
- SPYM 1.00%, better
- IMCG $0.62
- SPYM $0.91
- IMCG $0.19
- SPYM $0.24
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- SPYM Sep 11, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- SPYM Sep 15, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- SPYM Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs SPYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCG
- SPYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 17.0%SPYM 12.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.84SPYM 1.37, better
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%SPYM −24.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14SPYM 1.01
IMCG and SPYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.02% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.02% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.
- 0.02% · 0.04%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.




