Skip to content

IMCG vs SPYM

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

IMCGANYSE Arca

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

SPYMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SPYM −0.04pt a year

IMCG0.06%SPYM0.02%

Avg volume · 30D

SPYM 92.3×the volume

IMCG131KSPYM12.1M

10Y return · a year

SPYM +1.2pt

IMCG+14.5%SPYM+15.7%

IMCG vs SPYM Performance

Oct 28, 2021 – Oct 28, 2026

+34.1%IMCG+80.7%SPYM

Oct 28, 2021 to Oct 28, 2026. IMCG +34.1%. SPYM +80.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%50%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IMCG 0.06%
SPYM 0.02%, better
Fund size
IMCG $4.11B
SPYM $183B
1Y total return
IMCG +15.4%, better
SPYM +13.7%
Yield (12M)
IMCG 0.65%
SPYM 1.00%, better
Holdings
IMCG 262
SPYM 508
Avg volume (30D)
IMCG 131K sh
SPYM 12.1M sh, better
NAV per share
IMCG $95.12
SPYM $90.06
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IMCG: Cost 78, Risk 74, Mission 95, Tradability 62, Holdings 75, Durability 66. SPYM: Cost 99, Risk 51, Mission 100, Tradability 72, Holdings 57, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for IMCG, SPYM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIMCGSPYM
Cost30% weightA78A99
Mission25% weightA95A100
Risk15% weightA74C51
Tradability15% weightB62A72
Holdings10% weightA75B57
Durability5% weightB66A79

Where each fund ranks

Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.

Different Categories. Their Grades do not compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

IMCG ranks 2nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2ASCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFScore 78

S&P 500⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

SPYM ranks 1st of 14 funds in the S&P 500 Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYMState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AIVViShares Core S&P 500 ETFScore 79

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IMCGAiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

SPYMAState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

In short

IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.

SPYM State Street's budget-priced S&P 500 tracker: the same 500 large caps as its famous sibling, for 0.02% a year, the lowest fee in its S&P 500 peer group. Running since 2005 and now one of the category's giants.

Stated mandate

IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.

SPYM The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P 500 Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S. large-cap equities.

Why people hold it

  • IMCG 0.06% a year, one third of the 0.18% median for its growth-fund peer group. Mid-cap indexing at large-cap-index prices.
  • The growth leaderboard is stacked with large-cap funds (VUG, SCHG, SPYG, VONG). IMCG covers the middle instead, holding about 300 mid-cap growth names.
  • Sticks close to the Morningstar mid-cap growth index it follows, one of the tighter tracking jobs in its peer group.
  • Running since 2004 under the iShares roof, with a multi-billion-dollar asset base behind it.
  • SPYM 0.02% a year, the cheapest fee in its S&P 500 cohort, against a 0.15% median for the group. Two dollars a year per $10,000 invested.
  • Same S&P 500 index as State Street's flagship SPY (0.09%), for a fraction of the fee, and a basis point under VOO and IVV.
  • Tracks the index tightly: gaps between fund and benchmark are among the smallest in its peer group, which is the whole job of an index wrapper.
  • Live since 2005, now one of the largest and most heavily traded funds in the category. Distributions land quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • IMCG Moderately traded rather than heavily traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the megacap growth ETFs sitting beside it in the category.
  • This is a size-and-style bet. Mid-cap growth companies tend to move more sharply than the broad market, in both directions.
  • Distributions land quarterly, but a growth screen is not built around income.
  • SPYM The S&P 500 is cap-weighted, so the biggest US companies drive most of the move. Equal-weight takes on the same index (RSP) spread that bet differently.
  • About 500 US large caps and nothing else: no mid caps, no small caps, no international.
  • The fee edge over VOO and IVV is one basis point. Same index, so trading costs and platform access matter as much as the sticker fee.

Full IMCG profile⁠

Full SPYM profile⁠

IMCG vs SPYM Holdings

Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IMCG vs SPYM Cost

Overpaying IMCG vs SPYM

$844

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IMCG 0.06%

    $1,270

  • SPYM 0.02%

    $426

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IMCG 0.06%
  • SPYM 0.02%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K051015202530IMCG $1,270SPYM $426

Year by year

YearIMCGSPYMOverpaying
10$110$37$73
20$432$144$288
30$1,270$426$844

Expense ratio

  • 0.06%IMCG
  • 0.02%SPYM, cheaper

Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.Different Categories, so each fee sits in its own Category’s range.

IMCG among 35 US Growth Index funds

  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds

SPYM among 14 S&P 500 funds

  • Middle half of S&P 500 funds
  • Median 0.09%

SPYM cheapest of 14 funds

IMCG vs SPYM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 28, 2026
Yield (12M)
IMCG 0.65%
SPYM 1.00%, better
Payout (12M)
IMCG $0.62
SPYM $0.91
Last payment
IMCG $0.19
SPYM $0.24
Ex-dividend
IMCG Sep 15, 2026
SPYM Sep 11, 2026
Paid on
IMCG Sep 18, 2026
SPYM Sep 15, 2026
Frequency
IMCG Quarterly
SPYM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IMCGQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IMCG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.03; Jun 27, 2017 $0.03; Sep 26, 2017 $0.05; Dec 19, 2017 $0.04; Mar 22, 2018 $0.03; Jun 26, 2018 $0.03; Sep 26, 2018 $0.02; Dec 17, 2018 $0.03; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 17, 2019 $0.02; Sep 24, 2019 $0.02; Dec 16, 2019 $0.07; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Jun 15, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.01; Dec 14, 2020 $0.0067; Mar 25, 2021 $0.0083; Jun 10, 2021 $0.08; Sep 24, 2021 $0.10; Dec 13, 2021 $0.11; Mar 24, 2022 $0.10; Jun 9, 2022 $0.08; Sep 26, 2022 $0.14; Dec 13, 2022 $0.18; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Jun 7, 2023 $0.09; Sep 26, 2023 $0.15; Dec 20, 2023 $0.18; Mar 21, 2024 $0.13; Jun 11, 2024 $0.11; Sep 25, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.17; Mar 18, 2025 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.14; Sep 16, 2025 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $0.21; Mar 17, 2026 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.10; Sep 15, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
SPYMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll SPYM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.12; Jun 16, 2017 $0.13; Sep 15, 2017 $0.14; Dec 15, 2017 $0.16; Mar 16, 2018 $0.14; Jun 15, 2018 $0.15; Sep 21, 2018 $0.19; Dec 21, 2018 $0.17; Mar 15, 2019 $0.15; Jun 21, 2019 $0.17; Sep 20, 2019 $0.17; Dec 20, 2019 $0.19; Mar 23, 2020 $0.18; Jun 22, 2020 $0.17; Sep 21, 2020 $0.15; Dec 21, 2020 $0.18; Mar 22, 2021 $0.17; Jun 21, 2021 $0.17; Sep 20, 2021 $0.15; Dec 20, 2021 $0.20; Mar 21, 2022 $0.17; Jun 21, 2022 $0.19; Sep 19, 2022 $0.19; Dec 19, 2022 $0.21; Mar 20, 2023 $0.18; Jun 20, 2023 $0.20; Sep 18, 2023 $0.20; Dec 18, 2023 $0.22; Mar 18, 2024 $0.20; Jun 24, 2024 $0.22; Sep 23, 2024 $0.22; Dec 27, 2024 $0.24; Mar 28, 2025 $0.22; Jun 27, 2025 $0.21; Sep 26, 2025 $0.24; Dec 26, 2025 $0.24; Mar 13, 2026 $0.19; Jun 12, 2026 $0.24; Sep 11, 2026 $0.24. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

IMCG vs SPYM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IMCG
  • SPYM
Oct 28, 2021 to Oct 28, 2026. Worst fall: IMCG −35.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IMCG 17.0%SPYM 12.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IMCG 0.84SPYM 1.37, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IMCG −35.1%SPYM −24.5%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IMCG 1.14SPYM 1.01

IMCG and SPYM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IMCGAvsSPYGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPYMAvsIVVA

    State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF · iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.02% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsSCHGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPYMAvsVOOA

    State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF · Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.02% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsIVVA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.03%
    Category
    Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.
  • SPYMAvsSPYGA

    State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.02% · 0.04%
    Category
    Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.