IMCG ranks 2nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs IVV
IVV −0.03pt a year
0.06%0.03%
IVV 48.8×the volume
131K6.39M
IVV +1.2pt
+14.5%+15.7%
IMCG vs IVV Performance
+34.1%+80.7%
- IMCG 0.06%
- IVV 0.03%, better
- IMCG $4.11B
- IVV $889B
- IMCG +15.4%, better
- IVV +13.7%
- IMCG 0.65%
- IVV 1.08%, better
- IMCG 262
- IVV 507
- IMCG 131K sh
- IVV 6.39M sh, better
- IMCG $95.12
- IVV $775.30
ETF.net Grade
No winner tick: these funds sit in different Categories, and each Score ranks a fund only inside its own Category.
| Pillar | IMCG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A84 |
| Mission | A95 | A100 |
| Risk | A74 | C51 |
| Tradability | B62 | A80 |
| Holdings | A75 | B55 |
| Durability | B66 | A86 |
Where each fund ranks
Different Categories. Their Grades do not compare head to head.
IVV ranks 2nd of 14 funds in the S&P 500 Category.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
IVVA
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
IVV The 2000-vintage iShares take on the S&P 500, now a $100B-plus cornerstone holding: roughly 500 large US companies, 0.03% a year, and tracking that stays tight to the index.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
IVV The fund seeks to track the investment results of an index made up of large-capitalization U.S. equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs IVV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs IVV Cost
Overpaying IMCG vs IVV
$632
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
IVV 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | IVV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $55 | $55 |
| 20 | $432 | $216 | $216 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $638 | $632 |
- 0.06%IMCG
- 0.03%IVV, cheaper
Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.Different Categories, so each fee sits in its own Category’s range.
IMCG among 35 US Growth Index funds
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
IVV among 14 S&P 500 funds
- Middle half of S&P 500 funds
- Median 0.09%
IVV 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
IMCG vs IVV Dividends
- IMCG 0.65%
- IVV 1.08%, better
- IMCG $0.62
- IVV $8.40
- IMCG $0.19
- IVV $2.20
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- IVV Sep 15, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- IVV Sep 18, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- IVV Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs IVV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCG
- IVV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 17.0%IVV 12.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.84IVV 1.37, better
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%IVV −24.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14IVV 1.00
IMCG and IVV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.02%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.




