INCE ranks 4th and QVOY 33rd of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
INCE vs QVOY
INCE −1.03pt a year
0.29%1.32%
INCE 4.5×the volume
47.3K10.5K
INCE +7.7pt
+19.1%+11.4%
INCE vs QVOY Performance
+22.6%+4.9%
- INCE 0.29%, better
- QVOY 1.32%
- INCE $368M
- QVOY $56M
- INCE +22.6%, better
- QVOY +4.9%
- INCE 5.28%
- QVOY 8.91%, better
- INCE 112
- QVOY 13
- INCE 47.3K sh, better
- QVOY 10.5K sh
- INCE $68.80
- QVOY $28.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INCE | QVOY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | F3 |
| Mission | B60 | |
| Risk | B64Higher | F13 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A85Higher | C51 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. INCE and QVOY are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INCEA
QVOYD
In short
INCE Franklin's income playbook run through stocks instead of bonds: roughly 100 equity-focused positions, monthly payouts, and an objective that targets lower volatility than the S&P 500, at a fee well under the typical allocation fund.
QVOY A small Michigan quant shop runs QVOY as a tactical allocation sleeve: it rotates among four baskets of funds (core equity, active equity, bonds, alternatives) instead of parking in a fixed stock-and-bond mix.
Stated mandate
INCE The Fund seeks income from equity securities and related instruments while also pursuing capital appreciation and lower volatility than the S&P 500 Index.
QVOY The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital through active, systematic and quantitative allocation among core equity, active equity, bonds and alternatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INCE vs QVOY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INCE vs QVOY Cost
Overpaying QVOY vs INCE
$17,716
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INCE 0.29%
$5,952
QVOY 1.32%
$23,668
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INCE | QVOY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $2,296 | $1,769 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $8,507 | $6,463 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $23,668 | $17,716 |
- 0.29%INCE, cheaper
- 1.32%QVOY
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
INCE 7th cheapest of 37 funds
QVOY 36th cheapest of 37 funds
INCE vs QVOY Dividends
- INCE 5.28%
- QVOY 8.91%, better
- INCE $3.64
- QVOY $2.50
- INCE $0.30
- QVOY $2.50
- INCE Oct 30, 2026
- QVOY Dec 23, 2025
- INCE Pays Nov 4, 2026
- QVOY Dec 26, 2025
- INCE Monthly
- QVOY Annual
Distribution history
INCE vs QVOY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INCE 10.8%, betterQVOY 13.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- INCE 1.28, betterQVOY 0.54
- Worst fall
- INCE −18.4%QVOY −17.0%
- Market sensitivity
- INCE 0.60QVOY 1.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.