IRTR ranks 3rd and QVOY 33rd of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
IRTR vs QVOY
IRTR −1.24pt a year
0.08%1.32%
IRTR 1.2×the volume
12.7K10.5K
IRTR +1.7pt
+13.1%+11.4%
IRTR vs QVOY Performance
+5.1%+4.9%
- IRTR 0.08%, better
- QVOY 1.32%
- IRTR $60M
- QVOY $56M
- IRTR +5.1%, better
- QVOY +4.9%
- IRTR 3.17%
- QVOY 8.91%, better
- IRTR 29140
- QVOY 13
- IRTR 12.7K sh, better
- QVOY 10.5K sh
- IRTR $31.52
- QVOY $28.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IRTR | QVOY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F3 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B60 |
| Risk | A82Higher | F13 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A80Higher | D38 |
| Durability | B56Higher | C51 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. IRTR and QVOY are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IRTRA
QVOYD
In short
IRTR A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: global stock and bond ETFs blended at the conservative end, for 0.08% a year. That is index-fund pricing on a job most allocation funds charge roughly ten times more to do.
QVOY A small Michigan quant shop runs QVOY as a tactical allocation sleeve: it rotates among four baskets of funds (core equity, active equity, bonds, alternatives) instead of parking in a fixed stock-and-bond mix.
Stated mandate
IRTR The fund seeks conservative exposure through a broad portfolio of stock and bond ETFs spanning global asset classes.
QVOY The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital through active, systematic and quantitative allocation among core equity, active equity, bonds and alternatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IRTR vs QVOY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IRTR vs QVOY Cost
Overpaying QVOY vs IRTR
$21,979
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IRTR 0.08%
$1,689
QVOY 1.32%
$23,668
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IRTR | QVOY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $2,296 | $2,149 |
| 20 | $575 | $8,507 | $7,932 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $23,668 | $21,979 |
- 0.08%IRTR, cheaper
- 1.32%QVOY
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
IRTR 2nd cheapest of 37 funds
QVOY 36th cheapest of 37 funds
IRTR vs QVOY Dividends
- IRTR 3.17%
- QVOY 8.91%, better
- IRTR $1.00
- QVOY $2.50
- IRTR $0.08
- QVOY $2.50
- IRTR Oct 2, 2026
- QVOY Dec 23, 2025
- IRTR Oct 7, 2026
- QVOY Dec 26, 2025
- IRTR Monthly
- QVOY Annual
Distribution history
IRTR vs QVOY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IRTR 7.3%, betterQVOY 13.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- IRTR 1.14, betterQVOY 0.54
- Worst fall
- IRTR −6.3%QVOY −17.0%
- Market sensitivity
- IRTR 0.47QVOY 1.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.