INTF ranks 1st and RWIN 21st of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
INTF vs RWIN
INTF −0.26pt a year
0.16%0.42%
INTF 431.6×the volume
309K716
INTF vs RWIN Performance
−1.8%+0.7%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- RWIN 0.42%
- INTF $3.7B
- RWIN $20M
- INTF +17.0%
- RWIN
- INTF 3.02%
- RWIN
- INTF 501
- RWIN 171
- INTF 309K sh, better
- RWIN 716 sh
- INTF $41.10
- RWIN $27.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INTF | RWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | D28 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55 | A89Higher |
| Tradability | A73Higher | F19 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A86Higher | F20 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. INTF and RWIN are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INTFA
RWIND
In short
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
RWIN Rayliant's quant house fills the gap in its NxtGen lineup: developed markets outside the US, sorted by factor models instead of market cap. It arrived in 2026 charging 0.42% into an aisle stacked with cheap, entrenched rivals.
Stated mandate
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
RWIN The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INTF vs RWIN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INTF vs RWIN Cost
Overpaying RWIN vs INTF
$5,130
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
RWIN 0.42%
$8,472
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INTF | RWIN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $759 | $467 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $2,927 | $1,786 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $8,472 | $5,130 |
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- 0.42%RWIN
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
RWIN 22nd cheapest of 30 funds
INTF vs RWIN Dividends
- INTF 3.02%
- RWIN
- INTF $1.24
- RWIN
- INTF $0.72
- RWIN $0.05
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- RWIN Sep 29, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- RWIN Oct 1, 2026
- INTF Twice a year
- RWIN Quarterly
Distribution history
INTF vs RWIN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INTF 11.2%RWIN
- Return per unit of risk
- INTF 1.45RWIN
- Worst fall
- INTF −27.6%RWIN
- Market sensitivity
- INTF 0.74RWIN 0.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.