Skip to content

ITDD vs ITDH

iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF

ITDDBNYSE Arca

iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF

ITDHBNYSE Arca

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

ITDD −0.01pt a year

ITDD0.11%ITDH0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

ITDD 2.8×the volume

ITDD18.5KITDH6.66K

3Y return · a year

ITDH +3.7pt

ITDD+16.5%ITDH+20.2%

ITDD vs ITDH Performance

Nov 3, 2025 – Nov 3, 2026

+9.3%ITDD+12.4%ITDH

Nov 3, 2025 to Nov 3, 2026. ITDD +9.3%. ITDH +12.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%15%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ITDD 0.11%, better
ITDH 0.12%
Fund size
ITDD $124M
ITDH $48M
1Y total return
ITDD +9.3%
ITDH +12.4%, better
Yield (12M)
ITDD 1.68%, better
ITDH 1.44%
Holdings
ITDD 29140
ITDH 11928
Avg volume (30D)
ITDD 18.5K sh, better
ITDH 6.66K sh
NAV per share
ITDD $38.15
ITDH $41.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ITDD: Cost 46, Risk 62, Mission 100, Tradability 75, Holdings 64, Durability 75. ITDH: Cost 46, Risk 39, Mission 100, Tradability 52, Holdings 68, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for ITDD, ITDH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarITDDITDH
Cost30% weightC46C46
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightB62HigherD39
Tradability15% weightA75HigherC52
Holdings10% weightB64B68Higher
Durability5% weightA75HigherC54

Rank among Target Date funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ITDD and ITDH are both graded against the same 9 Target Date funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Target Date⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

ITDD ranks 3rd and ITDH 6th of 9 funds in the Target Date Category.

  1. Rank 1AITDCiShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2AITDBiShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3BITDDiShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 4BITDEiShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 5BITDGiShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 6BITDHiShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETFScore 61
  7. Rank 7BITDFiShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ITDDBiShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF

ITDHBiShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF

In short

ITDD A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: a global mix of stock and bond ETFs that drifts toward bonds as 2040 gets closer. The 401(k) staple, unbundled into something any brokerage account can buy for 0.11% a year.

ITDH The 401(k) staple, freed from the 401(k). BlackRock's LifePath glide path in a single ticker: a diversified basket of iShares stock and bond ETFs built for a retirement around 2060, shifting toward conservative as that date nears.

Stated mandate

ITDD The fund seeks to provide a diversified mix of stock and bond ETFs for investors expecting to retire or begin withdrawals around 2040. Its allocation becomes more conservative as the target date approaches.

ITDH The fund provides access to a diversified portfolio of stock and bond ETFs designed for investors expecting to retire or begin withdrawals around 2060. Its allocation becomes progressively more conservative as the target date approaches.

Why people hold it

  • ITDD One trade buys a diversified global mix of stock and bond ETFs that grows more conservative as the 2040 target date nears. No rebalancing homework on your end.ishares.com
  • Costs 0.11% a year, in line with the typical target-date ETF and cheap for a fund that handles the whole asset mix.
  • Ordinary 1940 Act fund in an ETF wrapper, so the glide-path approach long locked inside employer plan menus trades like any other ticker.ishares.com
  • ITDH One ticker, whole portfolio. A diversified mix of stock and bond ETFs that steps down risk on its own as 2060 approaches. No rebalancing homework.ishares.com
  • Does what the label says. Its portfolio matches its stated mandate closely, one reason it sits in the upper half of the target-date ETF group.
  • 0.12% a year buys a managed, multi-asset glide path, right around the going rate for target-date ETFs.
  • No plan menu required. Fund-of-funds allocation in a 1940 Act ETF, so it trades in any brokerage account during market hours.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • ITDD The glide path is the manager's design. The stock-to-bond shift runs on their schedule and their assumptions, not on your own read of markets or retirement timing.ishares.com
  • Launched in 2023 and trades lightly next to core index ETFs, so spreads can be wider than headline funds. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • In our target-date group it sits in the bottom quartile, behind LifePath siblings a few rungs up and down the ladder such as ITDC and ITDE.
  • ITDH Launched in 2023, still a small and thinly traded fund. Spreads can run wider than on big index ETFs, and size limits its trading cushion.
  • A 2060 date means a stock-heavy mix for years. Expect it to ride equity markets until the glide path leans into bonds.
  • Costs a hair more than nearer-dated siblings in the same suite, such as ITDC at 0.10%.

Full ITDD profile⁠

Full ITDH profile⁠

ITDD vs ITDH Holdings

How ITDD and ITDH differ

Overlap by weight is not available for these funds.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile92.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors95.5%

Sector

Sector weights in ITDD and ITDH, widest gap first
SectorMore in ITDDMore in ITDHGap
Real EstateITDD +2.6 points
TechnologyITDH +1.4 points
FinancialsITDH +1.0 points
UtilitiesITDD +1.1 points
Health CareITDH +0.6 points
IndustrialsITDD +0.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryITDH +0.5 points
CommunicationITDH +0.3 points
EnergyITDD +0.3 points
MaterialsITDH +0.2 points
Consumer StaplesITDH +0.3 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ITDD and ITDH, widest gap first
CountryMore in ITDDMore in ITDHGap
United StatesITDD +8.0 points
JapanITDH +1.6 points
NetherlandsITDH +1.4 points
TaiwanITDH +1.1 points
South KoreaITDH +0.7 points
United KingdomITDH +0.6 points
CanadaITDH +0.5 points
Other countries (6)ITDH +2.2 points

Outside the US: ITDD 69% developed, 31% emerging. ITDH 68% developed, 32% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ITDD15.4%
  • ITDH20.6%

Asset class

ITDD
Multi-Asset
ITDH
Multi-Asset

Holdings

Top 10 Holdings

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingITDDITDH
AAPLApple3.10%4.14%
NVDANVIDIA2.97%3.97%
MSFTMicrosoft2.41%3.22%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc1.45%1.94%
Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing1.11%1.55%
GOOGLAlphabet Class A1.02%1.36%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.94%1.26%
METAMeta Platforms Class A0.84%1.12%
GOOGAlphabet Class C0.82%1.10%
TSLATesla Inc0.73%0.97%

All ITDD holdings⁠All ITDH holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ITDD vs ITDH Cost

Overpaying ITDH vs ITDD

$207

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ITDD 0.11%

    $2,313

  • ITDH 0.12%

    $2,520

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ITDD 0.11%
  • ITDH 0.12%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K051015202530ITDH $2,520ITDD $2,313

Year by year

YearITDDITDHOverpaying
10$201$220$19
20$788$859$71
30$2,313$2,520$207

Expense ratio

  • 0.11%ITDD, cheaper
  • 0.12%ITDH
  • Middle half of Target Date funds
  • Median 0.11%

ITDD 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

ITDH 6th cheapest of 9 funds

ITDD vs ITDH Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 3, 2026
Yield (12M)
ITDD 1.68%, better
ITDH 1.44%
Payout (12M)
ITDD $0.64
ITDH $0.60
Last payment
ITDD $0.64
ITDH $0.60
Ex-dividend
ITDD Dec 23, 2025
ITDH Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
ITDD Dec 29, 2025
ITDH Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
ITDD Annual
ITDH Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ITDDAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ITDD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.24; Dec 20, 2024 $0.48; Dec 23, 2025 $0.64. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
ITDHAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ITDH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.23; Dec 20, 2024 $0.52; Dec 23, 2025 $0.60. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ITDD vs ITDH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ITDD 9.8%, betterITDH 11.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ITDD 1.30ITDH 1.41, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ITDD −12.5%since Oct 2023ITDH −16.3%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ITDD 0.75ITDH 0.90

Popular comparisons

  • ITDDBvsITDCA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.11% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDHBvsITDCA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDDBvsITDBA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.11% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDHBvsITDBA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDDBvsITDEB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.11% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDHBvsITDEB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.