ITDB ranks 2nd and ITDH 6th of 9 funds in the Target Date Category.
ITDB vs ITDH
ITDB −0.03pt a year
0.09%0.12%
ITDB 2.4×the volume
15.8K6.66K
ITDH +7.3pt
+12.9%+20.2%
ITDB vs ITDH Performance
+6.3%+12.4%
- ITDB 0.09%, better
- ITDH 0.12%
- ITDB $83M
- ITDH $48M
- ITDB +6.3%
- ITDH +12.4%, better
- ITDB 1.94%, better
- ITDH 1.44%
- ITDB 29140
- ITDH 11928
- ITDB 15.8K sh, better
- ITDH 6.66K sh
- ITDB $34.78
- ITDH $41.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ITDB | ITDH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | C46 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B67Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | B55Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | A73Higher | B68 |
| Durability | B65Higher | C54 |
Rank among Target Date funds
Same Category. ITDB and ITDH are both graded against the same 9 Target Date funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ITDBA
ITDHB
In short
ITDB The 401(k) staple, unbundled. One ticker holds a global basket of iShares funds and walks down a preset glide path toward 2030, from the suite that first brought target-date investing out of workplace plans and onto an exchange.
ITDH The 401(k) staple, freed from the 401(k). BlackRock's LifePath glide path in a single ticker: a diversified basket of iShares stock and bond ETFs built for a retirement around 2060, shifting toward conservative as that date nears.
Stated mandate
ITDB The Fund seeks retirement outcomes through a broad portfolio of ETFs. It reallocates among underlying funds using a predetermined glide path that becomes more conservative as the target date approaches.
ITDH The fund provides access to a diversified portfolio of stock and bond ETFs designed for investors expecting to retire or begin withdrawals around 2060. Its allocation becomes progressively more conservative as the target date approaches.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ITDB vs ITDH Holdings
How ITDB and ITDH differ
Overlap by weight is not available for these funds.
Level by level
- Country84.5%
- Sector95.1%
Sector
| Sector | More in ITDBMore in ITDH | Gap | ITDB | ITDH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | ITDH +2.5 points | 28.5% | 31.0% | |
| Real Estate | ITDB +2.0 points | 5.1% | 3.1% | |
| Utilities | ITDB +1.4 points | 3.6% | 2.2% | |
| Communication | ITDH +1.1 points | 6.3% | 7.4% | |
| Energy | ITDB +0.9 points | 4.9% | 4.0% | |
| Financials | ITDH +0.7 points | 15.2% | 15.9% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | ITDH +0.3 points | 8.0% | 8.3% | |
| Industrials | ITDB +0.3 points | 11.2% | 10.9% | |
| Consumer Staples | ITDB +0.2 points | 4.6% | 4.4% | |
| Materials | ITDH +0.1 points | 3.8% | 3.9% | |
| Health Care | ITDB +0.1 points | 8.9% | 8.8% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ITDBMore in ITDH | Gap | ITDB | ITDH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | ITDB +15.5 points | 83.0% | 67.5% | |
| Japan | ITDH +3.0 points | 3.4% | 6.4% | |
| Taiwan | ITDH +2.0 points | 1.8% | 3.8% | |
| India | ITDH +1.5 points | 0.0% | 1.5% | |
| Netherlands | ITDH +1.4 points | 0.0% | 1.4% | |
| South Korea | ITDH +1.3 points | 1.3% | 2.6% | |
| United Kingdom | ITDH +1.2 points | 2.2% | 3.4% | |
| Canada | ITDH +1.2 points | 2.0% | 3.2% | |
| Other countries (5) | ITDH +4.0 points | 6.2% | 10.2% |
Outside the US: ITDH 68% developed, 32% emerging.
Concentration
- ITDB11.2%
- ITDH20.6%
Asset class
- ITDB
- Multi-Asset
- ITDH
- Multi-Asset
Holdings
Top 10 Holdings
| Holding | ITDB | ITDH |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 2.22% | 4.14% |
| NVDA | 2.12% | 3.97% |
| MSFT | 1.72% | 3.22% |
| AMZN | 1.04% | 1.94% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing | 0.74% | 1.55% |
| GOOGL | 0.72% | 1.36% |
| AVGO | 0.67% | 1.26% |
| META | 0.60% | 1.12% |
| GOOG | 0.59% | 1.10% |
| TSLA | 0.52% | 0.97% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ITDB vs ITDH Cost
Overpaying ITDH vs ITDB
$622
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ITDB 0.09%
$1,898
ITDH 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ITDB | ITDH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $220 | $55 |
| 20 | $646 | $859 | $213 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $2,520 | $622 |
- 0.09%ITDB, cheaper
- 0.12%ITDH
- Middle half of Target Date funds
- Median 0.11%
ITDB cheapest of 9 funds
ITDH 6th cheapest of 9 funds
ITDB vs ITDH Dividends
- ITDB 1.94%, better
- ITDH 1.44%
- ITDB $0.67
- ITDH $0.60
- ITDB $0.67
- ITDH $0.60
- ITDB Dec 23, 2025
- ITDH Dec 23, 2025
- ITDB Dec 29, 2025
- ITDH Dec 29, 2025
- ITDB Annual
- ITDH Annual
Distribution history
ITDB vs ITDH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ITDB 7.9%, betterITDH 11.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- ITDB 1.18ITDH 1.41, better
- Worst fall
- ITDB −8.4%ITDH −16.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ITDB 0.58ITDH 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.