Skip to content

ITDB vs ITDH

iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

ITDBANYSE Arca

iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF

ITDHBNYSE Arca

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

ITDB −0.03pt a year

ITDB0.09%ITDH0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

ITDB 2.4×the volume

ITDB15.8KITDH6.66K

3Y return · a year

ITDH +7.3pt

ITDB+12.9%ITDH+20.2%

ITDB vs ITDH Performance

Nov 3, 2025 – Nov 3, 2026

+6.3%ITDB+12.4%ITDH

Nov 3, 2025 to Nov 3, 2026. ITDB +6.3%. ITDH +12.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%10%15%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ITDB 0.09%, better
ITDH 0.12%
Fund size
ITDB $83M
ITDH $48M
1Y total return
ITDB +6.3%
ITDH +12.4%, better
Yield (12M)
ITDB 1.94%, better
ITDH 1.44%
Holdings
ITDB 29140
ITDH 11928
Avg volume (30D)
ITDB 15.8K sh, better
ITDH 6.66K sh
NAV per share
ITDB $34.78
ITDH $41.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ITDB: Cost 89, Risk 67, Mission 100, Tradability 55, Holdings 73, Durability 65. ITDH: Cost 46, Risk 39, Mission 100, Tradability 52, Holdings 68, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for ITDB, ITDH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarITDBITDH
Cost30% weightA89HigherC46
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightB67HigherD39
Tradability15% weightB55HigherC52
Holdings10% weightA73HigherB68
Durability5% weightB65HigherC54

Rank among Target Date funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ITDB and ITDH are both graded against the same 9 Target Date funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Target Date⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

ITDB ranks 2nd and ITDH 6th of 9 funds in the Target Date Category.

  1. Rank 1AITDCiShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2AITDBiShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3BITDDiShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 5BITDGiShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 6BITDHiShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETFScore 61
  6. Rank 7BITDFiShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ITDBAiShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

ITDHBiShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF

In short

ITDB The 401(k) staple, unbundled. One ticker holds a global basket of iShares funds and walks down a preset glide path toward 2030, from the suite that first brought target-date investing out of workplace plans and onto an exchange.

ITDH The 401(k) staple, freed from the 401(k). BlackRock's LifePath glide path in a single ticker: a diversified basket of iShares stock and bond ETFs built for a retirement around 2060, shifting toward conservative as that date nears.

Stated mandate

ITDB The Fund seeks retirement outcomes through a broad portfolio of ETFs. It reallocates among underlying funds using a predetermined glide path that becomes more conservative as the target date approaches.

ITDH The fund provides access to a diversified portfolio of stock and bond ETFs designed for investors expecting to retire or begin withdrawals around 2060. Its allocation becomes progressively more conservative as the target date approaches.

Why people hold it

  • ITDB 0.09% a year, below the median for target-date ETFs, for a whole diversified portfolio you never rebalance by hand.
  • One decision, not twelve: a global mix of underlying iShares ETFs that reallocates on a predetermined glide path, growing more conservative as 2030 approaches.
  • Launched October 2023 in the first US suite of target-date ETFs, so the format lives in a brokerage account instead of only inside an employer plan.yahoo.com
  • ITDH One ticker, whole portfolio. A diversified mix of stock and bond ETFs that steps down risk on its own as 2060 approaches. No rebalancing homework.ishares.com
  • Does what the label says. Its portfolio matches its stated mandate closely, one reason it sits in the upper half of the target-date ETF group.
  • 0.12% a year buys a managed, multi-asset glide path, right around the going rate for target-date ETFs.
  • No plan menu required. Fund-of-funds allocation in a 1940 Act ETF, so it trades in any brokerage account during market hours.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • ITDB Thinly traded with a modest asset base next to headline index ETFs, so spreads can be wider and order type matters more.
  • No outside benchmark to grade it against. BlackRock sets the glide path, so the stock/bond mix reflects its own house view.
  • At the target date the fund is designed to transition into the iShares LifePath Retirement ETF, so holding past 2030 means holding a different vehicle.yahoo.com
  • ITDH Launched in 2023, still a small and thinly traded fund. Spreads can run wider than on big index ETFs, and size limits its trading cushion.
  • A 2060 date means a stock-heavy mix for years. Expect it to ride equity markets until the glide path leans into bonds.
  • Costs a hair more than nearer-dated siblings in the same suite, such as ITDC at 0.10%.

Full ITDB profile⁠

Full ITDH profile⁠

ITDB vs ITDH Holdings

How ITDB and ITDH differ

Overlap by weight is not available for these funds.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile84.5%
  • Sector11 Sectors95.1%

Sector

Sector weights in ITDB and ITDH, widest gap first
SectorMore in ITDBMore in ITDHGap
TechnologyITDH +2.5 points
Real EstateITDB +2.0 points
UtilitiesITDB +1.4 points
CommunicationITDH +1.1 points
EnergyITDB +0.9 points
FinancialsITDH +0.7 points
Consumer DiscretionaryITDH +0.3 points
IndustrialsITDB +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesITDB +0.2 points
MaterialsITDH +0.1 points
Health CareITDB +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ITDB and ITDH, widest gap first
CountryMore in ITDBMore in ITDHGap
United StatesITDB +15.5 points
JapanITDH +3.0 points
TaiwanITDH +2.0 points
IndiaITDH +1.5 points
NetherlandsITDH +1.4 points
South KoreaITDH +1.3 points
United KingdomITDH +1.2 points
CanadaITDH +1.2 points
Other countries (5)ITDH +4.0 points

Outside the US: ITDH 68% developed, 32% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ITDB11.2%
  • ITDH20.6%

Asset class

ITDB
Multi-Asset
ITDH
Multi-Asset

Holdings

Top 10 Holdings

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingITDBITDH
AAPLApple2.22%4.14%
NVDANVIDIA2.12%3.97%
MSFTMicrosoft1.72%3.22%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc1.04%1.94%
Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing0.74%1.55%
GOOGLAlphabet Class A0.72%1.36%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.67%1.26%
METAMeta Platforms Class A0.60%1.12%
GOOGAlphabet Class C0.59%1.10%
TSLATesla Inc0.52%0.97%

All ITDB holdings⁠All ITDH holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ITDB vs ITDH Cost

Overpaying ITDH vs ITDB

$622

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ITDB 0.09%

    $1,898

  • ITDH 0.12%

    $2,520

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ITDB 0.09%
  • ITDH 0.12%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K051015202530ITDH $2,520ITDB $1,898

Year by year

YearITDBITDHOverpaying
10$165$220$55
20$646$859$213
30$1,898$2,520$622

Expense ratio

  • 0.09%ITDB, cheaper
  • 0.12%ITDH
  • Middle half of Target Date funds
  • Median 0.11%

ITDB cheapest of 9 funds

ITDH 6th cheapest of 9 funds

ITDB vs ITDH Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 3, 2026
Yield (12M)
ITDB 1.94%, better
ITDH 1.44%
Payout (12M)
ITDB $0.67
ITDH $0.60
Last payment
ITDB $0.67
ITDH $0.60
Ex-dividend
ITDB Dec 23, 2025
ITDH Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
ITDB Dec 29, 2025
ITDH Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
ITDB Annual
ITDH Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ITDBAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ITDB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.17; Dec 20, 2024 $0.58; Dec 23, 2025 $0.67. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
ITDHAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ITDH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.23; Dec 20, 2024 $0.52; Dec 23, 2025 $0.60. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ITDB vs ITDH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ITDB 7.9%, betterITDH 11.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ITDB 1.18ITDH 1.41, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ITDB −8.4%since Oct 2023ITDH −16.3%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ITDB 0.58ITDH 0.90

Popular comparisons

  • ITDBAvsITDCA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDHBvsITDCA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDBAvsITDDB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDHBvsITDDB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDBAvsITDEB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDHBvsITDEB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.