Skip to content

ITDC vs ITDH

iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF

ITDCANYSE Arca

iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF

ITDHBNYSE Arca

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

ITDC −0.02pt a year

ITDC0.10%ITDH0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

ITDC 2.9×the volume

ITDC19.6KITDH6.66K

3Y return · a year

ITDH +5.4pt

ITDC+14.8%ITDH+20.2%

ITDC vs ITDH Performance

Nov 3, 2025 – Nov 3, 2026

+7.8%ITDC+12.4%ITDH

Nov 3, 2025 to Nov 3, 2026. ITDC +7.8%. ITDH +12.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%15%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ITDC 0.10%, better
ITDH 0.12%
Fund size
ITDC $125M
ITDH $48M
1Y total return
ITDC +7.8%
ITDH +12.4%, better
Yield (12M)
ITDC 1.89%, better
ITDH 1.44%
Holdings
ITDC 29117
ITDH 11928
Avg volume (30D)
ITDC 19.6K sh, better
ITDH 6.66K sh
NAV per share
ITDC $36.36
ITDH $41.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ITDC: Cost 89, Risk 65, Mission 100, Tradability 75, Holdings 69, Durability 75. ITDH: Cost 46, Risk 39, Mission 100, Tradability 52, Holdings 68, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for ITDC, ITDH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarITDCITDH
Cost30% weightA89HigherC46
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightB65HigherD39
Tradability15% weightA75HigherC52
Holdings10% weightB69HigherB68
Durability5% weightA75HigherC54

Rank among Target Date funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ITDC and ITDH are both graded against the same 9 Target Date funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Target Date⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

ITDC ranks 1st and ITDH 6th of 9 funds in the Target Date Category.

  1. Rank 1AITDCiShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2AITDBiShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 5BITDGiShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 6BITDHiShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 7BITDFiShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ITDCAiShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF

ITDHBiShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF

In short

ITDC A whole retirement glide path in one ticker. ITDC holds a portfolio of iShares ETFs that shifts steadily more conservative as 2035 approaches, built for people planning to retire or start withdrawals around then.

ITDH The 401(k) staple, freed from the 401(k). BlackRock's LifePath glide path in a single ticker: a diversified basket of iShares stock and bond ETFs built for a retirement around 2060, shifting toward conservative as that date nears.

Stated mandate

ITDC The fund seeks retirement outcomes through a broad portfolio of ETFs whose allocation changes as the 2035 target date approaches. It is designed for investors expecting to retire or begin withdrawals around 2035 and becomes more conservative over time.

ITDH The fund provides access to a diversified portfolio of stock and bond ETFs designed for investors expecting to retire or begin withdrawals around 2060. Its allocation becomes progressively more conservative as the target date approaches.

Why people hold it

  • ITDC Target-date investing pulled out of the 401(k) menu: one ETF that owns a broad mix of funds and dials down risk on a schedule, so nobody has to rebalance by hand.ishares.com
  • Costs 0.10% a year, under the typical fee in its target-date ETF cohort and under the longer-dated LifePath siblings like ITDE and ITDH.
  • Holds the glide path its prospectus describes with no drift, and stands as one of the strongest implementations among the target-date ETFs we grade.ishares.com
  • ITDH One ticker, whole portfolio. A diversified mix of stock and bond ETFs that steps down risk on its own as 2060 approaches. No rebalancing homework.ishares.com
  • Does what the label says. Its portfolio matches its stated mandate closely, one reason it sits in the upper half of the target-date ETF group.
  • 0.12% a year buys a managed, multi-asset glide path, right around the going rate for target-date ETFs.
  • No plan menu required. Fund-of-funds allocation in a 1940 Act ETF, so it trades in any brokerage account during market hours.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • ITDC A smaller, thinly traded fund. Spreads can widen, so limit orders and calmer mid-day windows matter more here than with mega-cap index ETFs.
  • The 2035 date is the risk dial. This one keeps getting more conservative, while later-dated versions (ITDE, ITDH) sit earlier on their own glide paths.
  • Launched in 2023, so the live record is short, and payouts land once or twice a year rather than monthly.
  • ITDH Launched in 2023, still a small and thinly traded fund. Spreads can run wider than on big index ETFs, and size limits its trading cushion.
  • A 2060 date means a stock-heavy mix for years. Expect it to ride equity markets until the glide path leans into bonds.
  • Costs a hair more than nearer-dated siblings in the same suite, such as ITDC at 0.10%.

Full ITDC profile⁠

Full ITDH profile⁠

ITDC vs ITDH Holdings

How ITDC and ITDH differ

Overlap by weight is not available for these funds.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile88.3%
  • Sector11 Sectors95.9%

Sector

Sector weights in ITDC and ITDH, widest gap first
SectorMore in ITDCMore in ITDHGap
Real EstateITDC +2.3 points
TechnologyITDH +1.2 points
FinancialsITDH +1.0 points
UtilitiesITDC +1.1 points
Health CareITDH +0.6 points
IndustrialsITDC +0.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryITDH +0.5 points
EnergyITDC +0.3 points
MaterialsITDH +0.3 points
CommunicationITDH +0.2 points
Consumer StaplesITDH +0.3 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ITDC and ITDH, widest gap first
CountryMore in ITDCMore in ITDHGap
United StatesITDC +11.7 points
JapanITDH +2.1 points
IndiaITDH +1.5 points
TaiwanITDH +1.4 points
NetherlandsITDH +1.4 points
South KoreaITDH +0.9 points
United KingdomITDH +0.8 points
CanadaITDH +0.8 points
Other countries (5)ITDH +2.7 points

Outside the US: ITDH 68% developed, 32% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ITDC13.6%
  • ITDH20.6%

Asset class

ITDC
Multi-Asset
ITDH
Multi-Asset

Holdings

Top 10 Holdings

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingITDCITDH
AAPLApple2.72%4.14%
NVDANVIDIA2.61%3.97%
MSFTMicrosoft2.12%3.22%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc1.27%1.94%
Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing0.95%1.55%
GOOGLAlphabet Class A0.89%1.36%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.83%1.26%
METAMeta Platforms Class A0.74%1.12%
GOOGAlphabet Class C0.72%1.10%
TSLATesla Inc0.64%0.97%

All ITDC holdings⁠All ITDH holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ITDC vs ITDH Cost

Overpaying ITDH vs ITDC

$414

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ITDC 0.10%

    $2,106

  • ITDH 0.12%

    $2,520

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ITDC 0.10%
  • ITDH 0.12%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K051015202530ITDH $2,520ITDC $2,106

Year by year

YearITDCITDHOverpaying
10$183$220$37
20$717$859$142
30$2,106$2,520$414

Expense ratio

  • 0.10%ITDC, cheaper
  • 0.12%ITDH
  • Middle half of Target Date funds
  • Median 0.11%

ITDC 2nd cheapest of 9 funds

ITDH 6th cheapest of 9 funds

ITDC vs ITDH Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 3, 2026
Yield (12M)
ITDC 1.89%, better
ITDH 1.44%
Payout (12M)
ITDC $0.69
ITDH $0.60
Last payment
ITDC $0.69
ITDH $0.60
Ex-dividend
ITDC Dec 23, 2025
ITDH Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
ITDC Dec 29, 2025
ITDH Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
ITDC Annual
ITDH Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ITDCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ITDC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.23; Dec 20, 2024 $0.58; Dec 23, 2025 $0.69. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
ITDHAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ITDH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.23; Dec 20, 2024 $0.52; Dec 23, 2025 $0.60. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ITDC vs ITDH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ITDC 8.9%, betterITDH 11.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ITDC 1.25ITDH 1.41, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ITDC −10.4%since Oct 2023ITDH −16.3%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ITDC 0.67ITDH 0.90

Popular comparisons

  • ITDCAvsITDBA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDHBvsITDBA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDCAvsITDDB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDHBvsITDDB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDCAvsITDEB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDHBvsITDEB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.