IVVM ranks 4th and SPBW 7th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.
IVVM vs SPBW
0.0%by weight
IVVM −0.29pt a year
0.50%0.79%
IVVM 1.5×the volume
29.2K19.3K
IVVM vs SPBW Performance
+9.3%+8.2%
- IVVM 0.50%, better
- SPBW 0.79%
- IVVM $198M
- SPBW $95M
- IVVM +9.3%, better
- SPBW +8.2%
- IVVM 0.63%
- SPBW
- IVVM 6
- SPBW 13
- IVVM 29.2K sh, better
- SPBW 19.3K sh
- IVVM $37.59
- SPBW $29.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVVM | SPBW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85Higher | B62 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D34 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | A71Higher | F18 |
| Holdings | D36 | B61Higher |
| Durability | B69Higher | D35 |
Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Same Category. IVVM and SPBW are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVVMB
SPBWC
In short
IVVM Most buffer funds make you pick a start date. IVVM runs overlapping three-month tranches on IVV, each cushioning roughly the first 5% of losses in exchange for a cap, so no single reset date decides everything.
SPBW Twelve AllianzIM Buffer20 funds in one ticker, one for each calendar month. Instead of picking a start date and living with its cap for a year, you hold a rolling ladder built on the S&P 500.
Stated mandate
IVVM The fund seeks exposure to large-cap U.S. equities while using staggered-maturity buffers to protect approximately the first 5% of losses. It accepts limited upside and uses the laddered structure to reduce timing risk.
SPBW SPBW seeks capital appreciation with downside-risk mitigation by holding a roughly equal, laddered portfolio of twelve U.S. Equity Buffer20 ETFs. The underlying funds reference SPY and seek capped upside plus protection against the first 20% of SPY losses over one-year periods; SPBW itself has no stated buffer or cap.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVVM vs SPBW Holdings
How IVVM and SPBW differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of IVVM and 0.0% of SPBW.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in IVVMMore in SPBW | IVVM | SPBW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | IVVM +0.3 points | 40.4% | 40.1% |
| Financials | SPBW +0.1 points | 11.2% | 11.3% |
| Health Care | SPBW +0.1 points | 9.3% | 9.4% |
| Industrials | SPBW +0.1 points | 7.5% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | SPBW +0.1 points | 4.3% | 4.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IVVMMore in SPBW | IVVM | SPBW |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | IVVM +0.1 points | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | SPBW +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- IVVM101.7%
- SPBW83.6%
- IVVM4
- SPBW12
Asset class
- IVVM
- Equity
- SPBW
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in IVVM4
- In both0
- Only in SPBW12
Only in IVVM
4 securities, 100% of IVVM by weight
- Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust98.72%
- FEB27 Ivv Us P @ 759.180.99%
- JAN27 Ivv Us P @ 765.850.92%
- DEC26 Ivv Us P @ 770.740.77%
Only in SPBW
12 securities, 100% of SPBW by weight
- Allianzim Us Eq BUFFER20 Dec8.44%
- Allianzim Us Eq BUFFER20 Nov8.44%
- Allianzim Us Eq BUFFER20 Oct8.37%
- Allianzim Us Eq BUFFER20 Mar8.36%
- Allianzim Us Eq BUFFER20 Aug8.35%
- Allianzim Us Eq BUFFER20 Feb8.35%
- Allianzim Us Eq BUFFER20 Jan8.34%
- Allianzim Us Eq BUFFER20 Jul8.32%
- Allianzim Us Eq BUFFER20 Apr8.29%
- Allianzim Us Eq BUFFER20 Sep8.29%
- Allianzim Us Eq BUFFER20 May8.24%
- Allianzim Us Eq BUFFER20 Jun8.21%
Weight gaps
IVVM and SPBW share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVVM vs SPBW Cost
Overpaying SPBW vs IVVM
$5,195
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVVM 0.50%
$9,979
SPBW 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVVM | SPBW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,405 | $505 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,331 | $1,871 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $15,174 | $5,195 |
- 0.50%IVVM, cheaper
- 0.79%SPBW
- Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
IVVM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
SPBW 7th cheapest of 18 funds
IVVM vs SPBW Dividends
- IVVM 0.63%
- SPBW
- IVVM $0.24
- SPBW None
- IVVM $0.24
- SPBW
- IVVM Dec 23, 2025
- SPBW
- IVVM Dec 29, 2025
- SPBW
- IVVM Annual
- SPBW
Distribution history
IVVM vs SPBW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVVM 6.5%SPBW 4.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- IVVM 1.56SPBW 0.99
- Worst fall
- IVVM −11.6%SPBW −8.7%
- Market sensitivity
- IVVM 0.52SPBW 0.36
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.