PBFR ranks 2nd and SPBW 7th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.
PBFR vs SPBW
PBFR −0.29pt a year
0.50%0.79%
PBFR 2.5×the volume
48.7K19.3K
PBFR vs SPBW Performance
+8.4%+8.2%
- PBFR 0.50%, better
- SPBW 0.79%
- PBFR $244M
- SPBW $95M
- PBFR +8.4%, better
- SPBW +8.2%
- PBFR 0.01%
- SPBW
- PBFR 14
- SPBW 13
- PBFR 48.7K sh, better
- SPBW 19.3K sh
- PBFR $31.47
- SPBW $29.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PBFR | SPBW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85Higher | B62 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | C41Higher | F18 |
| Holdings | A71Higher | B61 |
| Durability | C53Higher | D35 |
Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Same Category. PBFR and SPBW are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PBFRB
SPBWC
In short
PBFR Most buffer ETFs make you pick a start month. PBFR skips that: one ticker holding twelve monthly vintages of PGIM's 20% S&P 500 buffer funds, so caps and buffers are staggered across the calendar.
SPBW Twelve AllianzIM Buffer20 funds in one ticker, one for each calendar month. Instead of picking a start date and living with its cap for a year, you hold a rolling ladder built on the S&P 500.
Stated mandate
PBFR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap equity exposure obtained through a laddered portfolio of twelve PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETFs, each intended to limit downside risk.
SPBW SPBW seeks capital appreciation with downside-risk mitigation by holding a roughly equal, laddered portfolio of twelve U.S. Equity Buffer20 ETFs. The underlying funds reference SPY and seek capped upside plus protection against the first 20% of SPY losses over one-year periods; SPBW itself has no stated buffer or cap.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PBFR vs SPBW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PBFR vs SPBW Cost
Overpaying SPBW vs PBFR
$5,195
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PBFR 0.50%
$9,979
SPBW 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PBFR | SPBW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,405 | $505 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,331 | $1,871 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $15,174 | $5,195 |
- 0.50%PBFR, cheaper
- 0.79%SPBW
- Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
PBFR 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
SPBW 7th cheapest of 18 funds
PBFR vs SPBW Dividends
- PBFR 0.01%
- SPBW
- PBFR $0.0025
- SPBW None
- PBFR $0.0025
- SPBW
- PBFR Dec 30, 2025
- SPBW
- PBFR Jan 2, 2026
- SPBW
- PBFR Irregular
- SPBW
Distribution history
PBFR vs SPBW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PBFR 4.2%SPBW 4.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- PBFR 1.22SPBW 0.99
- Worst fall
- PBFR −8.5%SPBW −8.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PBFR 0.34SPBW 0.36
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.