IWB ranks 4th and XMAG 14th of 29 funds in the US Large-Cap Category.
IWB vs XMAG
IWB −0.20pt a year
0.15%0.35%
IWB 6.9×the volume
491K70.9K
IWB vs XMAG Performance
+13.3%+16.1%
- IWB 0.15%, better
- XMAG 0.35%
- IWB $46.6B
- XMAG $199M
- IWB +13.3%
- XMAG +16.1%, better
- IWB 0.93%, better
- XMAG 0.45%
- IWB 1026
- XMAG 493
- IWB 491K sh, better
- XMAG 70.9K sh
- IWB $402.52
- XMAG $24.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWB | XMAG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63Higher | D30 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | C52 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | A75 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A92Higher | C50 |
Rank among US Large-Cap funds
Same Category. IWB and XMAG are both graded against the same 29 US Large-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWBA
XMAGB
In short
IWB The Russell 1000 in one ticker: US large caps plus the mid-cap tier underneath them. IWB has tracked that index since 2000, making it the veteran of the group, though newer clones now chase the same benchmark for less.
XMAG The large-cap 500 with the seven biggest names cut out. Defiance built XMAG for investors who want broad US exposure without Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Meta and Tesla setting the tone.
Stated mandate
IWB The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Index and provides broad exposure to U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks.
XMAG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the BITA US 500 ex-Magnificent 7 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWB vs XMAG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWB vs XMAG Cost
Overpaying XMAG vs IWB
$3,989
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWB 0.15%
$3,137
XMAG 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWB | XMAG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $634 | $360 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $2,454 | $1,383 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $7,126 | $3,989 |
- 0.15%IWB, cheaper
- 0.35%XMAG
- Middle half of US Large-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
IWB 11th cheapest of 29 funds
XMAG 20th cheapest of 29 funds
IWB vs XMAG Dividends
- IWB 0.93%, better
- XMAG 0.45%
- IWB $3.81
- XMAG $0.12
- IWB $1.01
- XMAG $0.12
- IWB Sep 15, 2026
- XMAG Dec 30, 2025
- IWB Sep 18, 2026
- XMAG Dec 31, 2025
- IWB Quarterly
- XMAG Irregular
Distribution history
IWB vs XMAG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWB 12.5%XMAG 11.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWB 1.39XMAG 0.92
- Worst fall
- IWB −25.2%XMAG −16.2%
- Market sensitivity
- IWB 1.01XMAG 0.80
IWB and XMAG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
