IWB ranks 4th and XOEF 13th of 29 funds in the US Large-Cap Category.
IWB vs XOEF
IWB −0.05pt a year
0.15%0.20%
IWB 121.5×the volume
491K4.04K
IWB vs XOEF Performance
+13.3%+19.7%
- IWB 0.15%, better
- XOEF 0.20%
- IWB $46.6B
- XOEF $22M
- IWB +13.3%
- XOEF +19.7%, better
- IWB 0.93%
- XOEF 1.09%, better
- IWB 1026
- XOEF 406
- IWB 491K sh, better
- XOEF 4.04K sh
- IWB $402.52
- XOEF $29.12
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWB | XOEF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A81 |
| Risk | C52 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A75 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A92Higher | D31 |
Rank among US Large-Cap funds
Same Category. IWB and XOEF are both graded against the same 29 US Large-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWBA
XOEFB
In short
IWB The Russell 1000 in one ticker: US large caps plus the mid-cap tier underneath them. IWB has tracked that index since 2000, making it the veteran of the group, though newer clones now chase the same benchmark for less.
XOEF The S&P 500 with its 100 biggest members cut out. XOEF holds the index's remaining large caps at capped weights, turning mega-cap concentration from a fact of life into a dial you set yourself.
Stated mandate
IWB The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Index and provides broad exposure to U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks.
XOEF The Fund seeks to track the S&P 500 ex-S&P 100 Select Index, which represents capped, large-capitalization U.S. equities in the S&P 500 Index after excluding S&P 100 constituents. It uses an indexing approach and representative sampling.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWB vs XOEF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWB vs XOEF Cost
Overpaying XOEF vs IWB
$1,018
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWB 0.15%
$3,137
XOEF 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWB | XOEF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $365 | $91 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,421 | $350 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $4,155 | $1,018 |
- 0.15%IWB, cheaper
- 0.20%XOEF
- Middle half of US Large-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
IWB 11th cheapest of 29 funds
XOEF 15th cheapest of 29 funds
IWB vs XOEF Dividends
- IWB 0.93%
- XOEF 1.09%, better
- IWB $3.81
- XOEF $0.33
- IWB $1.01
- XOEF $0.09
- IWB Sep 15, 2026
- XOEF Sep 15, 2026
- IWB Sep 18, 2026
- XOEF Sep 18, 2026
- IWB Quarterly
- XOEF Quarterly
Distribution history
IWB vs XOEF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWB 12.5%XOEF 11.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWB 1.39XOEF 1.13
- Worst fall
- IWB −25.2%XOEF −7.7%
- Market sensitivity
- IWB 1.01XOEF 0.63
IWB and XOEF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
