JUSA ranks 1st and IWLG 27th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
IWLG vs JUSA
JUSA −0.32pt a year
0.50%0.18%
JUSA 4.8×the volume
20.5K98.8K
IWLG vs JUSA Performance
−4.3%+10.3%
- IWLG 0.50%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- IWLG $318M
- JUSA $745M
- IWLG −4.3%
- JUSA +10.3%, better
- IWLG 0.00%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- IWLG 42
- JUSA 265
- IWLG 20.5K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- IWLG $54.20
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWLG | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A84Higher |
| Risk | D39 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | B58 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A71 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. IWLG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWLGB
JUSAA
In short
IWLG A growth-only boutique's flagship large-cap strategy, delivered in an ETF wrapper: roughly 40 high-conviction US names, non-diversified by design, measured against the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
IWLG The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in large-capitalization companies, defined as companies with market capitalizations above $4 billion, and typically invests substantially in domestic securities.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWLG vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWLG vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying IWLG vs JUSA
$6,230
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWLG 0.50%
$9,979
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWLG | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $328 | $572 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $1,281 | $2,179 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $3,749 | $6,230 |
- 0.50%IWLG
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
IWLG 33rd cheapest of 90 funds
IWLG vs JUSA Dividends
- IWLG 0.00%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- IWLG $0.0013
- JUSA $0.49
- IWLG $0.0013
- JUSA $0.13
- IWLG Dec 19, 2025
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- IWLG Dec 26, 2025
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- IWLG Annual
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
IWLG vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWLG 18.1%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWLG 0.93JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- IWLG −23.2%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- IWLG 1.23JUSA 0.98
IWLG and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

