Skip to content

IWLG vs LRGC

NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF

IWLGBNYSE Arca

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.11pt a year

IWLG0.50%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 1.7×the volume

IWLG20.5KLRGC34.1K

3Y return · a year

LRGC +0.6pt

IWLG+19.8%LRGC+20.4%

IWLG vs LRGC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−4.3%IWLG+9.2%LRGC

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. IWLG −4.3%. LRGC +9.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%0%5%15%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
IWLG 0.50%
LRGC 0.39%, better
Fund size
IWLG $318M
LRGC $1.35B
1Y total return
IWLG −4.3%
LRGC +9.2%, better
Yield (12M)
IWLG 0.00%
LRGC 0.53%, better
Holdings
IWLG 42
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
IWLG 20.5K sh
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
NAV per share
IWLG $54.20
LRGC $85.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IWLG: Cost 62, Risk 39, Mission 78, Tradability 75, Holdings 58, Durability 71. LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for IWLG, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIWLGLRGC
Cost30% weightB62A82Higher
Mission25% weightA78A79Higher
Risk15% weightD39A90Higher
Tradability15% weightA75A75
Holdings10% weightB58A77Higher
Durability5% weightA71A78Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IWLG and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and IWLG 27th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 24BQDVOAmplify CWP Growth & Income ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 27BIWLGNYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETFScore 59
  7. Rank 27BNUGONuveen Growth OpportunitiesScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IWLGBNYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

IWLG A growth-only boutique's flagship large-cap strategy, delivered in an ETF wrapper: roughly 40 high-conviction US names, non-diversified by design, measured against the Russell 1000 Growth Index.

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

IWLG The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in large-capitalization companies, defined as companies with market capitalizations above $4 billion, and typically invests substantially in domestic securities.

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

  • IWLG Winslow has been a registered investment adviser since 1992 and runs growth equity only; its US large cap growth team traces back to 1999. This ETF puts that flagship approach in a ticker.sec.govnylim.commorganstanley.com
  • About 40 holdings, so each pick carries real weight instead of being diluted into a benchmark-sized name list.
  • The portfolio matches the mandate on the page: at least 80% of net assets in US large caps above $4 billion in market value, mostly domestic securities.
  • Among the better-built options in a crowded conviction-growth field, landing in the upper half of its peer group on cost, mandate fidelity and structure.
  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

  • IWLG Non-diversified and concentrated: with about 40 names, individual stumbles land harder than they would in a broad index fund.yahoo.com
  • 0.50% net of a waiver through August 28, 2027 (0.82% gross) sits near the category median, while enhanced-index rivals JUSA and FELG charge 0.18%.
  • Volume is light next to the category's giants, which makes execution details (order type, time of day) more of a factor than with mega-funds.
  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full IWLG profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

IWLG vs LRGC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IWLG vs LRGC Cost

Overpaying IWLG vs LRGC

$2,081

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IWLG 0.50%

    $9,979

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IWLG 0.50%
  • LRGC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530IWLG $9,979LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearIWLGLRGCOverpaying
10$900$705$195
20$3,460$2,725$735
30$9,979$7,898$2,081

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%IWLG
  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

IWLG 33rd cheapest of 90 funds

IWLG vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
IWLG 0.00%
LRGC 0.53%, better
Payout (12M)
IWLG $0.0013
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
IWLG $0.0013
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
IWLG Dec 19, 2025
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
IWLG Dec 26, 2025
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
IWLG Annual
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

IWLGAnnual · 4 paymentsAll IWLG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 16, 2022 $0.01; Dec 15, 2023 $0.004; Dec 20, 2024 $0.63; Dec 19, 2025 $0.0013. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

IWLG vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IWLG 18.1%LRGC 12.7%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IWLG 0.93LRGC 1.26, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IWLG −23.2%since Jun 2022LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IWLG 1.23LRGC 1.00

Popular comparisons

  • IWLGBvsJUSAA

    NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IWLGBvsGUSEA

    NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IWLGBvsFELGA

    NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.