Skip to content

JANW vs PSFJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETF

JANWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

PSFJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSFJ −0.25pt a year

JANW0.74%PSFJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

JANW 4.6×the volume

JANW49.1KPSFJ10.6K

5Y return · a year

PSFJ +2.5pt

JANW+8.3%PSFJ+10.8%

JANW vs PSFJ Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+49.0%JANW+66.7%PSFJ

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. JANW +49.0%. PSFJ +66.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JANW 0.74%
PSFJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
JANW $255M
PSFJ $57M
1Y total return
JANW +8.5%
PSFJ +9.1%, better
Holdings
JANW 2
PSFJ 4
Avg volume (30D)
JANW 49.1K sh, better
PSFJ 10.6K sh
NAV per share
JANW $39.61
PSFJ $35.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JANW: Cost 37, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 89, Holdings 52, Durability 69. PSFJ: Cost 85, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings not scored, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for JANW, PSFJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJANWPSFJ
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC47HigherD30
Tradability15% weightA89HigherC51
Holdings10% weightC52Not scored
Durability5% weightB69HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JANW and PSFJ are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFJ ranks 2nd and JANW 9th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 8COCTWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETFScore 54
  5. Rank 9CJANWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 10CAPRWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JANWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETF

PSFJBPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

In short

JANW A 20% cushion on the S&P 500 that runs on the calendar. JANW resets every January 1 and settles December 31, trading away upside above a cap set at each reset in exchange for absorbing the first 20% of the reference ETF's decline.

PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.

Stated mandate

JANW The Fund is designed to match the Underlying ETF’s share-price return through the outcome period up to a specified upside cap, while limiting downside losses with a 20% buffer before fees and expenses.

PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • JANW The outcome period runs January 1 to December 31, so the hedge lines up with the calendar year instead of some odd mid-month anniversary.
  • A 20% buffer sits at the deep end of the category: it is designed to absorb the first 20% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's price decline over the period, before fees.
  • AllianzIM runs the same Buffer20 structure with other start months (MAYW, JUNW, AUGW, DECW), so a January reset is a choice and laddering across months is possible.
  • Launched at the end of 2020, it has rolled through the reset cycle for years and holds a few hundred million in assets, not a launch-week experiment.
  • PSFJ Costs 0.49% a year against a 0.74% median for 20% S&P 500 buffer funds, and undercuts the 0.74% AllianzIM month-series funds (JUNW, AUGW, DECW) built on the same reference.
  • Deep cushion by design: it aims to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each roughly one-year period, before fees and expenses.paceretfs.com
  • Live since 2021, with several annual reset cycles behind it and sibling funds (PSFM, PSFD) covering other start months. One of the stronger builds in a crowded 20% buffer field.

Worth knowing

  • JANW Buffer and cap are period math, before fees. Buy mid-year and you get whatever cushion and upside remain, not the terms printed each January.
  • The 0.74% fee matches the deep-buffer median but runs above cohort peers PSFJ and PSFM at 0.49% and PBFR at 0.50%.
  • Thinly traded next to the biggest buffer funds, which can mean wider spreads, and it has not been paying distributions.
  • PSFJ The price of the cushion is a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level set when each July outcome period begins, so a roaring market leaves gains on the table.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and the cushion remaining and the room left to run differ from the stated terms.paceretfs.com
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than in the biggest names in the group. Income is not part of the design either.

Full JANW profile⁠

Full PSFJ profile⁠

JANW vs PSFJ Holdings

How JANW and PSFJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JANW and 0.0% of PSFJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in JANW and PSFJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in JANWMore in PSFJ
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JANW and PSFJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in JANWMore in PSFJ
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • JANW103.3%
  • PSFJ103.1%

Securities held

  • JANW2
  • PSFJ3

Asset class

JANW
Equity
PSFJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in JANW2
  • In both0
  • Only in PSFJ3

Only in JANW

2 securities, 100% of JANW by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 5.11 C102.65%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 681.99 P0.68%

Only in PSFJ

3 securities, 100% of PSFJ by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 8.36 C97.95%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.77 P4.02%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 448.06 P0.37%

Weight gaps

JANW and PSFJ share no securities.

All 5 JANW holdings⁠All 7 PSFJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JANW vs PSFJ Cost

Overpaying JANW vs PSFJ

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JANW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JANW 0.74%
  • PSFJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JANW $14,307PSFJ $9,792

Year by year

YearJANWPSFJOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%JANW
  • 0.49%PSFJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds

JANW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

JANW vs PSFJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
JANW None
PSFJ None

Distribution history

JANWAll JANW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFJAll PSFJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JANW vs PSFJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • JANW
  • PSFJ
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PSFJ −12.2% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−6%−4%−2%0%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JANW 4.8%, betterPSFJ 7.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JANW 1.40PSFJ 1.51, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JANW −9.7%, betterPSFJ −12.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JANW 0.35PSFJ 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • JANWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JANWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JANWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.