Skip to content

JANW vs PSFO

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETF

JANWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

PSFOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFO −0.25pt a year

JANW0.74%PSFO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

JANW 6.9×the volume

JANW49.1KPSFO7.12K

5Y return · a year

PSFO +2.5pt

JANW+8.3%PSFO+10.8%

JANW vs PSFO Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+49.0%JANW+67.0%PSFO

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. JANW +49.0%. PSFO +67.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JANW 0.74%
PSFO 0.49%, better
Fund size
JANW $255M
PSFO $47M
1Y total return
JANW +8.5%
PSFO +11.2%, better
Holdings
JANW 2
PSFO 4
Avg volume (30D)
JANW 49.1K sh, better
PSFO 7.12K sh
NAV per share
JANW $39.61
PSFO $35.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JANW: Cost 37, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 89, Holdings 52, Durability 69. PSFO: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission 95, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for JANW, PSFO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJANWPSFO
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC47HigherD29
Tradability15% weightA89HigherC46
Holdings10% weightC52Not scored
Durability5% weightB69HigherB59

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JANW and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFO ranks 3rd and JANW 9th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 3BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 59
  6. Rank 8COCTWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETFScore 54
  7. Rank 9CJANWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETFScore 53
  8. Rank 10CAPRWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JANWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETF

PSFOBPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

In short

JANW A 20% cushion on the S&P 500 that runs on the calendar. JANW resets every January 1 and settles December 31, trading away upside above a cap set at each reset in exchange for absorbing the first 20% of the reference ETF's decline.

PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.

Stated mandate

JANW The Fund is designed to match the Underlying ETF’s share-price return through the outcome period up to a specified upside cap, while limiting downside losses with a 20% buffer before fees and expenses.

PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

Why people hold it

  • JANW The outcome period runs January 1 to December 31, so the hedge lines up with the calendar year instead of some odd mid-month anniversary.
  • A 20% buffer sits at the deep end of the category: it is designed to absorb the first 20% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's price decline over the period, before fees.
  • AllianzIM runs the same Buffer20 structure with other start months (MAYW, JUNW, AUGW, DECW), so a January reset is a choice and laddering across months is possible.
  • Launched at the end of 2020, it has rolled through the reset cycle for years and holds a few hundred million in assets, not a launch-week experiment.
  • PSFO 0.49% a year, below the median fee in its S&P 500 buffer cohort and well under peers like PMAY (0.79%) and BUFZ (0.95%).
  • Built to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over each outcome period before the fund itself starts taking losses.
  • A 1940 Act ETF holding its own option package, not a bank-issued note, so no third-party credit sits between you and the payoff. Running since 2021.
  • Rates in the upper tier of a two-dozen-fund group of S&P 500 buffer strategies, largely on price.

Worth knowing

  • JANW Buffer and cap are period math, before fees. Buy mid-year and you get whatever cushion and upside remain, not the terms printed each January.
  • The 0.74% fee matches the deep-buffer median but runs above cohort peers PSFJ and PSFM at 0.49% and PBFR at 0.50%.
  • Thinly traded next to the biggest buffer funds, which can mean wider spreads, and it has not been paying distributions.
  • PSFO The price of the cushion: gains stop at a cap fixed at the start of each period, and the fund hasn't been an income payer.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for the full October 1 to September 30 stretch. Buy mid-period and your real cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • Small asset base and light trading, which usually means wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get entered.

Full JANW profile⁠

Full PSFO profile⁠

JANW vs PSFO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JANW vs PSFO Cost

Overpaying JANW vs PSFO

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JANW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JANW 0.74%
  • PSFO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JANW $14,307PSFO $9,792

Year by year

YearJANWPSFOOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%JANW
  • 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFO cheapest of 24 funds

JANW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

JANW vs PSFO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
JANW None
PSFO None

Distribution history

JANWAll JANW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFOAll PSFO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JANW vs PSFO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • JANW
  • PSFO
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PSFO −12.1% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−4%−3%−2%−1%0%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JANW 4.8%, betterPSFO 6.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JANW 1.40, betterPSFO 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JANW −9.7%, betterPSFO −12.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JANW 0.35PSFO 0.50

Popular comparisons

  • JANWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JANWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JANWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.