Skip to content

JHAC vs NPFE

John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF

JHACDNYSE Arca

Npf Core Equity Etf

NPFEACboe

Overlap

26.0%by weight

Expense ratio

NPFE −0.32pt a year

JHAC0.72%NPFE0.40%

Avg volume · 30D

NPFE 41.1×the volume

JHAC246NPFE10.1K

JHAC vs NPFE Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.4%JHAC+1.8%NPFE

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. JHAC +1.4%. NPFE +1.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%3%4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
JHAC 0.72%
NPFE 0.40%, better
Fund size
JHAC $4M
NPFE $655M
1Y total return
JHAC +2.3%
NPFE No data
Yield (12M)
JHAC 2.28%
NPFE No data
Holdings
JHAC 49
NPFE 162
Avg volume (30D)
JHAC 246 sh
NPFE 10.1K sh, better
NAV per share
JHAC $15.61
NPFE $28.20
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JHAC: Cost 38, Risk 23, Mission 64, Tradability 13, Holdings 62, Durability 44. NPFE: Cost 94, Risk 83, Mission not scored, Tradability 63, Holdings 69, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for JHAC, NPFE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJHACNPFE
Cost30% weightD38A94Higher
Mission25% weightB64Not scored
Risk15% weightF23A83Higher
Tradability15% weightF13B63Higher
Holdings10% weightB62B69Higher
Durability5% weightC44B55Higher

Rank among US Active Quality funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JHAC and NPFE are both graded against the same 16 US Active Quality funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Quality⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

NPFE ranks 1st and JHAC 12th of 16 funds in the US Active Quality Category.

  1. Rank 1ANPFENpf Core Equity EtfScore 79
  2. Rank 2AQLTYGMO US Quality ETFScore 75
  3. Rank 11DBWTGBrendan Wood TopGun ETFScore 34
  4. Rank 12DJHACJohn Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETFScore 33
  5. Rank 13DNQLTNeuberger Quality Select ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JHACDJohn Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF

NPFEANpf Core Equity Etf

In short

JHAC A rare shielded active ETF: Manulife's analysts run an all-cap book of cash-generative businesses, and you see a daily tracking basket instead of the full holdings. Fee is 0.72% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.

NPFE No data

Stated mandate

JHAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

NPFE No data

Why people hold it

  • JHAC Runs under an SEC exemptive order as a semi-transparent ETF: it posts a daily tracking basket designed to closely track the portfolio, keeping the manager's actual trades out of public view.jhinvestments.comjhinvestments.com 2
  • Go-anywhere equity mandate. At least 80% of net assets in stocks spanning the full capitalization spectrum, with room for up to 20% in foreign issuers and ADRs. No index to hug.jhinvestments.com
  • Bottom-up research hunting growth drivers, sustainable cash flow and high returns on capital; positions get sold when they hit target valuation or the fundamentals deteriorate.jhinvestments.com
  • Subadvised by Manulife Investment Management (US), which ran this all-cap strategy as a composite before the ETF opened in 2023.jhinvestments.com

NPFE No data

Worth knowing

  • JHAC You pay up for the research: 0.72% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027, above the category median, with gross expenses at 5.11% while the asset base stays small.
  • Fully transparent peers cost less: PSET at 0.15% and QLTY at 0.50%, neither leaning on a waiver.
  • Small and thinly traded, so spreads can run wide, and the prospectus notes traders tend to charge more when they get less holdings information.jhinvestments.com

NPFE No data

Full JHAC profile⁠

Full NPFE profile⁠

JHAC vs NPFE Holdings

How JHAC and NPFE differ

Overlap by weight

26.0%

Shared holdings make up 51.3% of JHAC and 28.7% of NPFE.

Level by level

  • Holdings15 in both26.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors73.7%
  • Countryby domicile93.8%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in JHAC and NPFE, widest gap first
SectorMore in JHACMore in NPFE
Consumer DiscretionaryJHAC +10.5 points
TechnologyNPFE +8.8 points
Health CareNPFE +6.7 points
IndustrialsNPFE +5.4 points
MaterialsNPFE +5.3 points
EnergyJHAC +4.6 points
FinancialsJHAC +3.7 points
Real EstateJHAC +3.4 points
CommunicationJHAC +2.7 points
Consumer StaplesJHAC +1.2 points
UtilitiesNPFE +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JHAC and NPFE, widest gap first
CountryMore in JHACMore in NPFE
United StatesNPFE +3.2 points
TaiwanNPFE +2.8 points
CanadaJHAC +2.4 points
BelgiumJHAC +1.5 points
IsraelJHAC +1.2 points
SwitzerlandJHAC +0.8 points
Other countries (4)JHAC +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • JHAC47.5%
  • NPFE44.1%

Securities held

  • JHAC49
  • NPFE162

Asset class

JHAC
Equity
NPFE
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in JHAC34
  • In both15
  • Only in NPFE147

Only in JHAC

34 securities, 48.7% of JHAC by weight

  • Jh Ctf 20491231 00001.0000000000 0.000%, 12/31/20493.46%
  • KKR & Company, Inc.3.13%
  • Roper Technologies, Inc.2.65%

Only in NPFE

147 securities, 71.3% of NPFE by weight

  • Ball Corp4.13%
  • Visa Inc3.98%
  • Allison Transmission Holdings3.65%

Weight gaps

All 15 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in JHAC and NPFE, widest gap first
HoldingMore in JHACMore in NPFE
Broadcom, Inc.AVGOJHAC +4.40 points
Meta Platforms, Inc.METAJHAC +3.85 points
Amazon.com, Inc.AMZNJHAC +3.37 points
Microsoft Corp.MSFTNPFE +2.70 points
McKesson Corp.MCKJHAC +2.15 points
salesforce.com, Inc.CRMJHAC +2.05 points
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.UNHJHAC +1.75 points
Vulcan Materials CompanyVMCJHAC +1.51 points

All JHAC holdings⁠All NPFE holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JHAC vs NPFE Cost

Overpaying JHAC vs NPFE

$5,867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JHAC 0.72%

    $13,957

  • NPFE 0.40%

    $8,090

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JHAC 0.72%
  • NPFE 0.40%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JHAC $13,957NPFE $8,090

Year by year

YearJHACNPFEOverpaying
10$1,284$723$561
20$4,888$2,793$2,095
30$13,957$8,090$5,867

Expense ratio

  • 0.72%JHAC
  • 0.40%NPFE, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Quality funds
  • Median 0.65%

NPFE cheapest of 16 funds

JHAC 11th cheapest of 16 funds

JHAC vs NPFE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
JHAC 2.28%
NPFE No data
Payout (12M)
JHAC $0.36
NPFE No data
Last payment
JHAC $0.36
NPFE $0.08
Ex-dividend
JHAC Dec 29, 2025
NPFE Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
JHAC Dec 31, 2025
NPFE Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
JHAC Annual
NPFE Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

JHACAnnual · 3 paymentsAll JHAC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2023 $0.02; Dec 27, 2024 $0.10; Dec 29, 2025 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
NPFEIrregular · 1 paymentAll NPFE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

JHAC vs NPFE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JHAC 14.6%since Dec 2023NPFE No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JHAC 0.62since Dec 2023NPFE No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JHAC −24.4%since Nov 2023NPFE No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JHAC 1.16NPFE 0.48

Popular comparisons

  • JHACDvsQLTYA

    John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF · GMO US Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NPFEAvsQLTYA

    Npf Core Equity Etf · GMO US Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JHACDvsAQECB

    John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF · AQE Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NPFEAvsAQECB

    Npf Core Equity Etf · AQE Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JHACDvsQIDXB

    John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF · Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NPFEAvsQIDXB

    Npf Core Equity Etf · Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.