Skip to content

JHAC vs QIDX

John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF

JHACDNYSE Arca

Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

QIDXBNYSE Arca

Overlap

8.6%by weight

Expense ratio

QIDX −0.22pt a year

JHAC0.72%QIDX0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

QIDX 16.0×the volume

JHAC246QIDX3.94K

JHAC vs QIDX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.3%JHAC+8.2%QIDX

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. JHAC +2.3%. QIDX +8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
JHAC 0.72%
QIDX 0.50%, better
Fund size
JHAC $4M
QIDX $39M
1Y total return
JHAC +2.3%
QIDX +8.2%, better
Yield (12M)
JHAC 2.28%, better
QIDX 0.92%
Holdings
JHAC 49
QIDX 130
Avg volume (30D)
JHAC 246 sh
QIDX 3.94K sh, better
NAV per share
JHAC $15.61
QIDX $11.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JHAC: Cost 38, Risk 23, Mission 64, Tradability 13, Holdings 62, Durability 44. QIDX: Cost 75, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 23, Holdings 93, Durability 45.
Pillar letters and Scores for JHAC, QIDX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJHACQIDX
Cost30% weightD38A75Higher
Mission25% weightB64Not scored
Risk15% weightF23A76Higher
Tradability15% weightF13F23Higher
Holdings10% weightB62A93Higher
Durability5% weightC44C45Higher

Rank among US Active Quality funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JHAC and QIDX are both graded against the same 16 US Active Quality funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Quality⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

QIDX ranks 4th and JHAC 12th of 16 funds in the US Active Quality Category.

  1. Rank 1ANPFENpf Core Equity EtfScore 79
  2. Rank 2AQLTYGMO US Quality ETFScore 75
  3. Rank 3BAQECAQE Core ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BQIDXIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 5BQFFQualivian Focus Fund ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 11DBWTGBrendan Wood TopGun ETFScore 34
  7. Rank 12DJHACJohn Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETFScore 33
  8. Rank 13DNQLTNeuberger Quality Select ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JHACDJohn Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF

QIDXBIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

In short

JHAC A rare shielded active ETF: Manulife's analysts run an all-cap book of cash-generative businesses, and you see a daily tracking basket instead of the full holdings. Fee is 0.72% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.

QIDX An active quality fund stitched from Indexperts' own house indexes: steady-earnings names across large, mid and small caps, with a manager free to override the rules. It charges less than the typical fund in its peer group.

Stated mandate

JHAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

QIDX The Fund seeks total return.

Why people hold it

  • JHAC Runs under an SEC exemptive order as a semi-transparent ETF: it posts a daily tracking basket designed to closely track the portfolio, keeping the manager's actual trades out of public view.jhinvestments.comjhinvestments.com 2
  • Go-anywhere equity mandate. At least 80% of net assets in stocks spanning the full capitalization spectrum, with room for up to 20% in foreign issuers and ADRs. No index to hug.jhinvestments.com
  • Bottom-up research hunting growth drivers, sustainable cash flow and high returns on capital; positions get sold when they hit target valuation or the fundamentals deteriorate.jhinvestments.com
  • Subadvised by Manulife Investment Management (US), which ran this all-cap strategy as a composite before the ETF opened in 2023.jhinvestments.com
  • QIDX Charges 0.50% a year, below the median for its quality-focused peer group and about half what the priciest name in that group (EQTY, 0.99%) asks.
  • Rules first, judgment second: the portfolio is drawn from Indexperts' own growth and consistent-value indexes, with the advisor free to trim or exclude.sec.gov
  • Reaches across large, mid and small caps instead of hugging a handful of mega caps, and the portfolio build ranks among the stronger ones in its peer group.sec.gov
  • A plain 1940 Act equity fund seeking total return, with cash paid out quarterly. No leverage, no options overlay, no derivatives wrapper to decode.

Worth knowing

  • JHAC You pay up for the research: 0.72% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027, above the category median, with gross expenses at 5.11% while the asset base stays small.
  • Fully transparent peers cost less: PSET at 0.15% and QLTY at 0.50%, neither leaning on a waiver.
  • Small and thinly traded, so spreads can run wide, and the prospectus notes traders tend to charge more when they get less holdings information.jhinvestments.com
  • QIDX Listed at the end of 2024, so the track record is short and any read on its risk profile rests on limited history.
  • Small and thinly traded: spreads can run wider than on giant index funds, and size of order matters more.
  • You are paying 0.50% for a manager's judgment when index-built quality rivals like PSET run 0.15%.

Full JHAC profile⁠

Full QIDX profile⁠

JHAC vs QIDX Holdings

How JHAC and QIDX differ

Overlap by weight

8.6%

Shared holdings make up 18.9% of JHAC and 10.6% of QIDX.

Level by level

  • Holdings5 in both8.6%
  • Countryby domicile93.8%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for QIDX.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JHAC and QIDX, widest gap first
CountryMore in JHACMore in QIDX
United StatesQIDX +5.1 points
CanadaJHAC +2.5 points
BelgiumJHAC +1.5 points
IsraelJHAC +1.2 points
SwitzerlandJHAC +0.8 points
SingaporeQIDX +0.6 points
SwedenQIDX +0.5 points
ItalyJHAC +0.2 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • JHAC47.5%
  • QIDX25.3%

Securities held

  • JHAC49
  • QIDX129

Asset class

JHAC
Equity
QIDX
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in JHAC44
  • In both5
  • Only in QIDX124

Only in JHAC

44 securities, 81.1% of JHAC by weight

  • Amazon.com, Inc.7.11%
  • Meta Platforms, Inc.5.06%
  • Broadcom, Inc.4.46%

Only in QIDX

124 securities, 86.8% of QIDX by weight

  • Arista Networks, Inc.3.68%
  • Xom2.51%
  • HEICO Corporation2.44%

Weight gaps

All 5 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in JHAC and QIDX, widest gap first
HoldingMore in JHACMore in QIDX
Microsoft Corp.MSFTJHAC +7.70 points
Alphabet, Inc., Class AGOOGLJHAC +2.15 points
Apple, Inc.AAPLQIDX +1.39 points
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.TMOQIDX +0.64 points
S&P Global, Inc.SPGIJHAC +0.46 points

All JHAC holdings⁠All 130 QIDX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JHAC vs QIDX Cost

Overpaying JHAC vs QIDX

$3,978

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JHAC 0.72%

    $13,957

  • QIDX 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JHAC 0.72%
  • QIDX 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JHAC $13,957QIDX $9,979

Year by year

YearJHACQIDXOverpaying
10$1,284$900$384
20$4,888$3,460$1,428
30$13,957$9,979$3,978

Expense ratio

  • 0.72%JHAC
  • 0.50%QIDX, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Quality funds
  • Median 0.65%

QIDX 4th cheapest of 16 funds

JHAC 11th cheapest of 16 funds

JHAC vs QIDX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
JHAC 2.28%, better
QIDX 0.92%
Payout (12M)
JHAC $0.36
QIDX $0.11
Last payment
JHAC $0.36
QIDX $0.03
Ex-dividend
JHAC Dec 29, 2025
QIDX Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
JHAC Dec 31, 2025
QIDX Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
JHAC Annual
QIDX Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

JHACAnnual · 3 paymentsAll JHAC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2023 $0.02; Dec 27, 2024 $0.10; Dec 29, 2025 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
QIDXQuarterly · 7 paymentsAll QIDX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 28, 2025 $0.02; Jun 27, 2025 $0.02; Sep 29, 2025 $0.02; Dec 30, 2025 $0.03; Mar 30, 2026 $0.03; Jun 29, 2026 $0.03; Sep 29, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

JHAC vs QIDX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JHAC 14.6%since Dec 2023QIDX 9.9%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JHAC 0.62since Dec 2023QIDX 0.25since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JHAC −24.4%since Nov 2023QIDX −15.0%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JHAC 1.16QIDX 0.57

Popular comparisons

  • JHACDvsNPFEA

    John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QIDXBvsNPFEA

    Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JHACDvsQLTYA

    John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF · GMO US Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QIDXBvsQLTYA

    Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · GMO US Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JHACDvsAQECB

    John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF · AQE Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QIDXBvsAQECB

    Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · AQE Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.