ROM ranks 3rd and JNUG 74th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
JNUG vs ROM
ROM −0.10pt a year
1.03%0.93%
JNUG 5.9×the volume
283K47.7K
ROM +63.2pt
−26.6%+36.6%
JNUG vs ROM Performance
+61.3%+126.1%
- JNUG 1.03%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- JNUG $347M
- ROM $1.15B
- JNUG −26.7%
- ROM +26.5%, better
- JNUG 3.49%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- JNUG 7
- ROM 85
- JNUG 283K sh, better
- ROM 47.7K sh
- JNUG $114.05
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JNUG | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D34 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A73 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. JNUG and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JNUGD
ROMA
In short
JNUG Gold's high-octane corner. JNUG aims for 200% of the daily move in an index of junior gold miners, the small exploration and development names that swing hardest when bullion twitches. Running since 2013, built for day-length holding periods.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
JNUG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, before fees and expenses.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JNUG vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JNUG vs ROM Cost
Overpaying JNUG vs ROM
$1,634
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JNUG 1.03%
$19,173
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JNUG | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,814 | $1,644 | $170 |
| 20 | $6,807 | $6,199 | $608 |
| 30 | $19,173 | $17,539 | $1,634 |
- 1.03%JNUG
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
JNUG 78th cheapest of 95 funds
JNUG vs ROM Dividends
- JNUG 3.49%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- JNUG $3.51
- ROM $0.04
- JNUG $0.76
- ROM $0.02
- JNUG Sep 22, 2026
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- JNUG Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- JNUG Quarterly
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
JNUG vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JNUG
- ROM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JNUG 94.5%ROM 49.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JNUG 0.88ROM 0.97, better
- Worst fall
- JNUG −76.7%ROM −67.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- JNUG 0.86ROM 3.09
Popular comparisons
- 1.03% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.