PSFJ ranks 2nd and JULH 22nd of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
JULH vs PSFJ
PSFJ −0.30pt a year
0.79%0.49%
PSFJ 2.7×the volume
4K10.6K
PSFJ +8.5pt
+7.4%+15.9%
JULH vs PSFJ Performance
+5.9%+9.4%
- JULH 0.79%
- PSFJ 0.49%, better
- JULH $17M
- PSFJ $57M
- JULH +5.9%
- PSFJ +9.4%, better
- JULH 6.44%
- PSFJ
- JULH 5
- PSFJ 4
- JULH 4K sh
- PSFJ 10.6K sh, better
- JULH $24.97
- PSFJ $35.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULH | PSFJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | C45 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C40 | B57Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. JULH and PSFJ are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JULHD
PSFJB
In short
JULH Defined outcome investing tilted toward income: JULH seeks a high level of income through defined distributions while applying a 20% barrier to S&P 500 price index losses over each July-to-June outcome period.
PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.
Stated mandate
JULH The Fund seeks to provide a high level of income through defined distributions while applying a 20% barrier to losses in the S&P 500 Price Return Index over each approximately one-year outcome period.
PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JULH vs PSFJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULH vs PSFJ Cost
Overpaying JULH vs PSFJ
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULH 0.79%
$15,174
PSFJ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULH | PSFJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $883 | $522 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,394 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,792 | $5,382 |
- 0.79%JULH
- 0.49%PSFJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds
JULH 22nd cheapest of 24 funds
JULH vs PSFJ Dividends
- JULH 6.44%
- PSFJ
- JULH $1.61
- PSFJ None
- JULH $0.41
- PSFJ
- JULH Sep 30, 2026
- PSFJ
- JULH Oct 2, 2026
- PSFJ
- JULH Quarterly
- PSFJ
Distribution history
JULH vs PSFJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JULH 1.7%, betterPSFJ 7.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- JULH 1.67, betterPSFJ 1.51
- Worst fall
- JULH −5.5%PSFJ −12.2%
- Market sensitivity
- JULH 0.09PSFJ 0.55
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.