PSFO ranks 4th and JULH 22nd of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
JULH vs PSFO
PSFO −0.30pt a year
0.79%0.49%
PSFO 1.8×the volume
4K7.12K
PSFO +7.1pt
+7.4%+14.5%
JULH vs PSFO Performance
+5.9%+11.5%
- JULH 0.79%
- PSFO 0.49%, better
- JULH $17M
- PSFO $47M
- JULH +5.9%
- PSFO +11.5%, better
- JULH 6.44%
- PSFO
- JULH 5
- PSFO 4
- JULH 4K sh
- PSFO 7.12K sh, better
- JULH $24.97
- PSFO $35.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULH | PSFO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | C45Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C40 | B59Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. JULH and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JULHD
PSFOB
In short
JULH Defined outcome investing tilted toward income: JULH seeks a high level of income through defined distributions while applying a 20% barrier to S&P 500 price index losses over each July-to-June outcome period.
PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.
Stated mandate
JULH The Fund seeks to provide a high level of income through defined distributions while applying a 20% barrier to losses in the S&P 500 Price Return Index over each approximately one-year outcome period.
PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JULH vs PSFO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULH vs PSFO Cost
Overpaying JULH vs PSFO
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULH 0.79%
$15,174
PSFO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULH | PSFO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $883 | $522 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,394 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,792 | $5,382 |
- 0.79%JULH
- 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFO cheapest of 24 funds
JULH 22nd cheapest of 24 funds
JULH vs PSFO Dividends
- JULH 6.44%
- PSFO
- JULH $1.61
- PSFO None
- JULH $0.41
- PSFO
- JULH Sep 30, 2026
- PSFO
- JULH Oct 2, 2026
- PSFO
- JULH Quarterly
- PSFO
Distribution history
JULH vs PSFO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JULH 1.7%, betterPSFO 6.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- JULH 1.67, betterPSFO 1.38
- Worst fall
- JULH −5.5%PSFO −12.1%
- Market sensitivity
- JULH 0.09PSFO 0.50
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.