Skip to content

JUNW vs PSFJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF

JUNWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

PSFJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFJ −0.25pt a year

JUNW0.74%PSFJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

JUNW 2.9×the volume

JUNW30.9KPSFJ10.6K

3Y return · a year

PSFJ +4.6pt

JUNW+10.5%PSFJ+15.1%

JUNW vs PSFJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+5.3%JUNW+9.1%PSFJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. JUNW +5.3%. PSFJ +9.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%7.5%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JUNW 0.74%
PSFJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
JUNW $378M
PSFJ $57M
1Y total return
JUNW +5.3%
PSFJ +9.1%, better
Holdings
JUNW 2
PSFJ 4
Avg volume (30D)
JUNW 30.9K sh, better
PSFJ 10.6K sh
NAV per share
JUNW $34.84
PSFJ $35.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JUNW: Cost 37, Risk 48, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 71, Durability 58. PSFJ: Cost 85, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings not scored, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for JUNW, PSFJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJUNWPSFJ
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC48HigherD30
Tradability15% weightB59HigherC51
Holdings10% weightA71Not scored
Durability5% weightB58HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JUNW and PSFJ are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFJ ranks 2nd and JUNW 13th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 12CJULWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETFScore 51
  5. Rank 13CJUNWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETFScore 49
  6. Rank 14CDECWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Dec ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JUNWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF

PSFJBPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

In short

JUNW JUNW is the June rung in AllianzIM's ladder of deep-buffer funds: it aims to match the one-year share-price return of the S&P 500's biggest ETF, absorbing the first 20% of losses in exchange for a capped upside.

PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.

Stated mandate

JUNW The Fund seeks to match the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust's share-price return at the end of each one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap and protection against the first 20% of losses.

PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • JUNW Deep by design: the structure is built to absorb the first 20% of a one-year decline in the reference ETF, with an upside cap set at the start of each period as the trade-off.
  • Fixed calendar: the June series runs June 1 through May 31, so the terms are published up front and reset on the same schedule every year.
  • One rung of a full ladder: AllianzIM runs the same 20% buffer with other start months (JANW, APRW, MAYW, AUGW, DECW), so this is a repeatable sleeve rather than a one-off.
  • The reference point is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, a price you can watch trade, not a bespoke index calculated somewhere out of view.
  • PSFJ Costs 0.49% a year against a 0.74% median for 20% S&P 500 buffer funds, and undercuts the 0.74% AllianzIM month-series funds (JUNW, AUGW, DECW) built on the same reference.
  • Deep cushion by design: it aims to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each roughly one-year period, before fees and expenses.paceretfs.com
  • Live since 2021, with several annual reset cycles behind it and sibling funds (PSFM, PSFD) covering other start months. One of the stronger builds in a crowded 20% buffer field.

Worth knowing

  • JUNW 0.74% a year is mid-pack for deep-buffer funds; cheaper builds of the same idea exist, including PBFR at 0.50% and Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds at 0.49%.
  • The payoff tracks share-price return only, so dividends from the underlying sit outside the deal, and gains stop at the cap.
  • Come in mid-period and you inherit a different cap and less remaining cushion; the math is engineered to land at the outcome period's end.
  • PSFJ The price of the cushion is a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level set when each July outcome period begins, so a roaring market leaves gains on the table.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and the cushion remaining and the room left to run differ from the stated terms.paceretfs.com
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than in the biggest names in the group. Income is not part of the design either.

Full JUNW profile⁠

Full PSFJ profile⁠

JUNW vs PSFJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JUNW vs PSFJ Cost

Overpaying JUNW vs PSFJ

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JUNW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JUNW 0.74%
  • PSFJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JUNW $14,307PSFJ $9,792

Year by year

YearJUNWPSFJOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%JUNW
  • 0.49%PSFJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds

JUNW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

JUNW vs PSFJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
JUNW None
PSFJ None

Distribution history

JUNWAll JUNW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFJAll PSFJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUNW vs PSFJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JUNW 4.9%, betterPSFJ 7.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JUNW 1.29PSFJ 1.51, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JUNW −8.5%since Jun 2023PSFJ −12.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JUNW 0.33PSFJ 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • JUNWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.