Skip to content

JUSA vs PJFG

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

JUSAANYSE Arca

PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF

PJFGDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

JUSA −0.57pt a year

JUSA0.18%PJFG0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

JUSA 26.9×the volume

JUSA98.8KPJFG3.67K

JUSA vs PJFG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.8%JUSA−0.3%PJFG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. JUSA +10.8%. PJFG −0.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
JUSA 0.18%, better
PJFG 0.75%
Fund size
JUSA $745M
PJFG $139M
1Y total return
JUSA +10.8%, better
PJFG −0.3%
Yield (12M)
JUSA 0.72%
PJFG No data
Holdings
JUSA 263
PJFG 39
Avg volume (30D)
JUSA 98.8K sh, better
PJFG 3.67K sh
NAV per share
JUSA $67.75
PJFG $117.79
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JUSA: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission 84, Tradability 58, Holdings 84, Durability 76. PJFG: Cost 19, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings 48, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for JUSA, PJFG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJUSAPJFG
Cost30% weightA99HigherF19
Mission25% weightA84Not scored
Risk15% weightA92HigherC44
Tradability15% weightB58HigherC51
Holdings10% weightA84HigherC48
Durability5% weightA76HigherB60

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JUSA and PJFG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

JUSA ranks 1st and PJFG 74th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 72DFRTYAlger Mid Cap 40 ETFScore 37
  4. Rank 74DPJFGPGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETFScore 36
  5. Rank 75DSEMGSuncoast Select Growth ETFScore 35

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JUSAAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

PJFGDPGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF

In short

JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.

PJFG Jennison's high-conviction growth playbook in an ETF wrapper: an actively managed, non-diversified book of medium and large caps, benchmarked to the Russell 1000 Growth. Concentration is the whole point here.

Stated mandate

JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.

PJFG The fund seeks long-term capital growth through an actively managed, focused portfolio of primarily medium- and large-cap companies judged to offer strong capital-appreciation potential.

Why people hold it

  • JUSA 0.18% a year with no waiver propping it up, below its category median. GUSE charges 0.30% and LRGC 0.39% for similar enhanced-index work; FELG ties it at 0.18%.
  • Active where it counts, plain where it doesn't: bottom-up stock picks across roughly 300 large caps, with sector mix and risk profile kept close to the S&P 500.jpmorgan.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in a 90-fund peer group of active large-cap funds, helped by a low fee and tightly managed risk.
  • PJFG Active and unapologetically concentrated: a non-diversified mandate means the managers' best growth ideas carry real weight instead of getting diluted across hundreds of names.pgim.com
  • Clear yardstick. It is measured against the Russell 1000 Growth Index, so its stock picking can be judged against the obvious passive alternative.pgim.com
  • Live since 2022, so there is a real record under the same mandate to examine, not a backtest.

Worth knowing

  • JUSA Launched in March 2025, so there is only a short live record on this ticker to judge.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than the giant index funds', especially in fast markets.
  • Tracking the S&P 500's sector weights limits how far results can stray from the benchmark in either direction. This is a nudge on the index, not a different bet.jpmorgan.com
  • PJFG Costs 0.75% a year, above the typical active growth fund and above same-benchmark peers like FFOG (0.41%) and PGRO (0.50%).
  • Thinly traded next to its peer group, so bid-ask spreads can be wider at the moment you transact.
  • Non-diversified cuts both ways: a stumble at one or two of the largest positions moves the whole fund.pgim.com

Full JUSA profile⁠

Full PJFG profile⁠

JUSA vs PJFG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JUSA vs PJFG Cost

Overpaying PJFG vs JUSA

$10,733

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JUSA 0.18%

    $3,749

  • PJFG 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JUSA 0.18%
  • PJFG 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PJFG $14,482JUSA $3,749

Year by year

YearJUSAPJFGOverpaying
10$328$1,336$1,008
20$1,281$5,078$3,797
30$3,749$14,482$10,733

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
  • 0.75%PJFG
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JUSA cheapest of 90 funds

PJFG 72nd cheapest of 90 funds

JUSA vs PJFG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
JUSA 0.72%
PJFG No data
Payout (12M)
JUSA $0.49
PJFG None
Last payment
JUSA $0.13
PJFG No data
Ex-dividend
JUSA Sep 22, 2026
PJFG No data
Paid on
JUSA Sep 24, 2026
PJFG No data
Frequency
JUSA Quarterly
PJFG No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

JUSAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JUSA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.15; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 22, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD
PJFGAll PJFG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUSA vs PJFG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JUSA 11.6%since Apr 2025PJFG 18.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JUSA 1.41since Apr 2025PJFG 0.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JUSA −14.0%since Mar 2025PJFG −24.2%since Dec 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JUSA 0.98PJFG 1.28

JUSA and PJFG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • JUSAAvsGUSEA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJFGDvsGUSEA

    PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsLRGCA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJFGDvsLRGCA

    PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsFELGA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJFGDvsFELGA

    PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.