JUSA ranks 1st and PJFG 74th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs PJFG
JUSA −0.57pt a year
0.18%0.75%
JUSA 26.9×the volume
98.8K3.67K
JUSA vs PJFG Performance
+10.8%−0.3%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- PJFG 0.75%
- JUSA $745M
- PJFG $139M
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- PJFG −0.3%
- JUSA 0.72%
- PJFG
- JUSA 263
- PJFG 39
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- PJFG 3.67K sh
- JUSA $67.75
- PJFG $117.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | PJFG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F19 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | B58Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | C48 |
| Durability | A76Higher | B60 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and PJFG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
PJFGD
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
PJFG Jennison's high-conviction growth playbook in an ETF wrapper: an actively managed, non-diversified book of medium and large caps, benchmarked to the Russell 1000 Growth. Concentration is the whole point here.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
PJFG The fund seeks long-term capital growth through an actively managed, focused portfolio of primarily medium- and large-cap companies judged to offer strong capital-appreciation potential.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs PJFG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs PJFG Cost
Overpaying PJFG vs JUSA
$10,733
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
PJFG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | PJFG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,336 | $1,008 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $5,078 | $3,797 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $14,482 | $10,733 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.75%PJFG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
PJFG 72nd cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs PJFG Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%
- PJFG
- JUSA $0.49
- PJFG None
- JUSA $0.13
- PJFG
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- PJFG
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- PJFG
- JUSA Quarterly
- PJFG
Distribution history
JUSA vs PJFG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%PJFG 18.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41PJFG 0.97
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%PJFG −24.2%
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98PJFG 1.28
JUSA and PJFG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

