LRGC ranks 3rd and PJFG 74th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
LRGC vs PJFG
LRGC −0.36pt a year
0.39%0.75%
LRGC 9.3×the volume
34.1K3.67K
PJFG +1.4pt
+21.5%+22.9%
LRGC vs PJFG Performance
+9.5%−0.3%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- PJFG 0.75%
- LRGC $1.37B
- PJFG $139M
- LRGC +9.5%, better
- PJFG −0.3%
- LRGC 0.53%
- PJFG
- LRGC 72
- PJFG 39
- LRGC 34.1K sh, better
- PJFG 3.67K sh
- LRGC $85.00
- PJFG $117.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LRGC | PJFG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | F19 |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | A90Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A75Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | C48 |
| Durability | A78Higher | B60 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. LRGC and PJFG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LRGCA
PJFGD
In short
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
PJFG Jennison's high-conviction growth playbook in an ETF wrapper: an actively managed, non-diversified book of medium and large caps, benchmarked to the Russell 1000 Growth. Concentration is the whole point here.
Stated mandate
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
PJFG The fund seeks long-term capital growth through an actively managed, focused portfolio of primarily medium- and large-cap companies judged to offer strong capital-appreciation potential.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LRGC vs PJFG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LRGC vs PJFG Cost
Overpaying PJFG vs LRGC
$6,584
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
PJFG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LRGC | PJFG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,336 | $631 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $5,078 | $2,353 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $14,482 | $6,584 |
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- 0.75%PJFG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
PJFG 72nd cheapest of 90 funds
LRGC vs PJFG Dividends
- LRGC 0.53%
- PJFG
- LRGC $0.45
- PJFG None
- LRGC $0.45
- PJFG
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- PJFG
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- PJFG
- LRGC Annual
- PJFG
Distribution history
LRGC vs PJFG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LRGC 12.7%, betterPJFG 18.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- LRGC 1.26, betterPJFG 0.97
- Worst fall
- LRGC −19.4%PJFG −24.2%
- Market sensitivity
- LRGC 1.00PJFG 1.28
LRGC and PJFG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
