PTBD ranks 3rd and KAMO 25th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
KAMO vs PTBD
PTBD −0.32pt a year
0.92%0.60%
KAMO 1.3×the volume
23.4K18.6K
KAMO vs PTBD Performance
−1.9%−0.5%
- KAMO 0.92%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- KAMO $107M
- PTBD $83M
- KAMO
- PTBD −0.2%
- KAMO
- PTBD 6.36%
- KAMO 6
- PTBD 1050
- KAMO 23.4K sh, better
- PTBD 18.6K sh
- KAMO $23.93
- PTBD $18.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KAMO | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A83Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | A78Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | F12 | A90Higher |
| Durability | B58 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. KAMO and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KAMOC
PTBDA
In short
KAMO Most bond funds can only buy bonds. KAMO runs a quantitative credit strategy that takes long or short positions across global fixed income, dialing duration and credit risk up or down, and it charges a bit less than the typical tactical fund.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
KAMO The Fund seeks income and capital appreciation through an actively managed, quantitative fixed-income strategy that takes long or short positions across credit and other fixed-income segments while managing duration and credit risk.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KAMO vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KAMO vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying KAMO vs PTBD
$5,556
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KAMO 0.92%
$17,373
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KAMO | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,627 | $1,076 | $551 |
| 20 | $6,138 | $4,116 | $2,022 |
| 30 | $17,373 | $11,817 | $5,556 |
- 0.92%KAMO
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
KAMO 23rd cheapest of 46 funds
KAMO vs PTBD Dividends
- KAMO
- PTBD 6.36%
- KAMO
- PTBD $1.17
- KAMO $0.29
- PTBD $0.10
- KAMO Sep 30, 2026
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- KAMO Oct 1, 2026
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- KAMO Quarterly
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
KAMO vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KAMO PTBD 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- KAMO PTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- KAMO PTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- KAMO 0.11PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.92% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.92% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.92% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.