Skip to content

KAMO vs PTBD

Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF

KAMOCCboe

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

PTBD −0.32pt a year

KAMO0.92%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

KAMO 1.3×the volume

KAMO23.4KPTBD18.6K

KAMO vs PTBD Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−1.9%KAMO−0.5%PTBD

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. KAMO −1.9%. PTBD −0.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
KAMO 0.92%
PTBD 0.60%, better
Fund size
KAMO $107M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
KAMO No data
PTBD −0.2%
Yield (12M)
KAMO No data
PTBD 6.36%
Holdings
KAMO 6
PTBD 1050
Avg volume (30D)
KAMO 23.4K sh, better
PTBD 18.6K sh
NAV per share
KAMO $23.93
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KAMO: Cost 53, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings 12, Durability 58. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for KAMO, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKAMOPTBD
Cost30% weightC53A83Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB55B60Higher
Tradability15% weightA78HigherC50
Holdings10% weightF12A90Higher
Durability5% weightB58A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KAMO and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and KAMO 25th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 24CXFLXFundX Flexible ETFScore 54
  6. Rank 25CKAMOKensington Credit Opportunities ETFScore 53
  7. Rank 26CCLSMETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KAMOCKensington Credit Opportunities ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

KAMO Most bond funds can only buy bonds. KAMO runs a quantitative credit strategy that takes long or short positions across global fixed income, dialing duration and credit risk up or down, and it charges a bit less than the typical tactical fund.

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

KAMO The Fund seeks income and capital appreciation through an actively managed, quantitative fixed-income strategy that takes long or short positions across credit and other fixed-income segments while managing duration and credit risk.

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

  • KAMO The mandate is unusual for a bond ETF: long or short positions across credit and other fixed-income segments, with duration and credit risk actively managed instead of pinned to an index.
  • 0.92% a year, just under the 0.95% median for its tactical multi-asset cohort.
  • Pays quarterly, and the stated aim is income plus capital appreciation, not price return alone.
  • Stands in the upper half of its tactical peer group on our review.
  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • KAMO Launched in December 2025, so the live record is short and any read on how the model behaves through a full credit cycle rests on limited history.
  • It does not trade heavily. Limit orders and mid-session trading help keep spread costs in check.
  • 0.92% is a real fee in absolute terms, and a book that can sit long or short will behave differently from a plain bond index.
  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full KAMO profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

KAMO vs PTBD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KAMO vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying KAMO vs PTBD

$5,556

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KAMO 0.92%

    $17,373

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KAMO 0.92%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KAMO $17,373PTBD $11,817

Year by year

YearKAMOPTBDOverpaying
10$1,627$1,076$551
20$6,138$4,116$2,022
30$17,373$11,817$5,556

Expense ratio

  • 0.92%KAMO
  • 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

KAMO 23rd cheapest of 46 funds

KAMO vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
KAMO No data
PTBD 6.36%
Payout (12M)
KAMO No data
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
KAMO $0.29
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
KAMO Sep 30, 2026
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
KAMO Oct 1, 2026
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
KAMO Quarterly
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

KAMOQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll KAMO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 31, 2025 $0.07; Mar 31, 2026 $0.21; Jun 30, 2026 $0.17; Sep 30, 2026 $0.29. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

KAMO vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KAMO No dataPTBD 5.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KAMO No dataPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KAMO No dataPTBD −24.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KAMO 0.11PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • KAMOCvsENDWA

    Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.92% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KAMOCvsGMODA

    Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.92% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KAMOCvsRISNA

    Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.92% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.