KBFR ranks 1st and RSSE 5th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.
KBFR vs RSSE
KBFR −0.06pt a year
0.79%0.85%
RSSE 3.1×the volume
3.25K9.94K
KBFR vs RSSE Performance
−0.8%+2.3%
- KBFR 0.79%, better
- RSSE 0.85%
- KBFR $13M
- RSSE $35M
- KBFR
- RSSE +13.9%
- KBFR 833
- RSSE 3
- KBFR 3.25K sh
- RSSE 9.94K sh, better
- KBFR $26.76
- RSSE $23.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KBFR | RSSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A75Higher | D39 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | C48 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | D38 |
| Durability | C48 | B67Higher |
Rank among Other Buffered funds
Same Category. KBFR and RSSE are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KBFRB
RSSEC
In short
KBFR Small caps with a seatbelt. Innovator's actively managed fund owns roughly 800 U.S. small caps and layers options on top, built around the 10% buffer in its name, and it undercuts the typical buffer fund on fee.
RSSE Most buffer ETFs bolt their downside cushion onto the megacap-heavy S&P 500. This one uses the equal-weight version instead, buffering the first 10% of losses over a one-year outcome period that resets every September.
Stated mandate
KBFR The Fund seeks long-term capital gains while mitigating overall market risk. It is actively managed and uses equity and option positions to provide risk-managed U.S. small-cap exposure.
RSSE The Fund seeks returns matching the price return of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF, up to a predetermined cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses during the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KBFR vs RSSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KBFR vs RSSE Cost
Overpaying RSSE vs KBFR
$1,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KBFR 0.79%
$15,174
RSSE 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KBFR | RSSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,508 | $103 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,706 | $375 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $16,199 | $1,025 |
- 0.79%KBFR, cheaper
- 0.85%RSSE
- Middle half of Other Buffered funds
- Median 0.85%
KBFR cheapest of 9 funds
RSSE 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
KBFR vs RSSE Dividends
- KBFR
- RSSE None
- KBFR $0.04
- RSSE
- KBFR Sep 30, 2026
- RSSE
- KBFR Oct 2, 2026
- RSSE
- KBFR Quarterly
- RSSE
Distribution history
KBFR vs RSSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KBFR RSSE 7.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- KBFR RSSE 0.67
- Worst fall
- KBFR RSSE −11.4%
- Market sensitivity
- KBFR 0.24RSSE 0.44
KBFR and RSSE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
