Skip to content

RSJN vs RSSE

FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June

RSJNBNYSE Arca

FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September

RSSECNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

RSJN0.85%RSSE0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

RSJN 2.9×the volume

RSJN28.4KRSSE9.94K

RSJN vs RSSE Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+13.5%RSJN+13.9%RSSE

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. RSJN +13.5%. RSSE +13.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%7.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RSJN 0.85%
RSSE 0.85%
Fund size
RSJN $86M
RSSE $35M
1Y total return
RSJN +13.5%
RSSE +13.9%, better
Holdings
RSJN 3
RSSE 3
Avg volume (30D)
RSJN 28.4K sh, better
RSSE 9.94K sh
NAV per share
RSJN $38.13
RSSE $23.93
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RSJN: Cost 39, Risk 79, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 57, Durability 84. RSSE: Cost 39, Risk 79, Mission 83, Tradability 64, Holdings 38, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for RSJN, RSSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRSJNRSSE
Cost30% weightD39D39
Mission25% weightNot scoredA83
Risk15% weightA79A79
Tradability15% weightB65HigherB64
Holdings10% weightB57HigherD38
Durability5% weightA84HigherB67

Rank among Other Buffered funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RSJN and RSSE are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Buffered⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

RSJN ranks 4th and RSSE 5th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.

  1. Rank 1BKBFRInnovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BTBJLInnovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - JulyScore 60
  3. Rank 3BIBUFInnovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 4BRSJNFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - JuneScore 57
  5. Rank 5CRSMRFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - MarchScore 53
  6. Rank 5CRSSEFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 53
  7. Rank 7CIBFRInnovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RSJNBFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June

RSSECFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September

In short

RSJN Most buffer ETFs are bolted onto the cap-weighted S&P 500, where a few megacaps call the shots. RSJN buffers the equal-weight version instead: the same 500-odd names, spread evenly, with the first 10% of losses absorbed over each June-to-June period.

RSSE Most buffer ETFs bolt their downside cushion onto the megacap-heavy S&P 500. This one uses the equal-weight version instead, buffering the first 10% of losses over a one-year outcome period that resets every September.

Stated mandate

RSJN Seeks returns matching the Underlying ETF’s price return up to a predetermined cap, while buffering the first 10% of its losses during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 Target Outcome Period.

RSSE The Fund seeks returns matching the price return of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF, up to a predetermined cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses during the current outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • RSJN The reference asset is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF, so roughly 500 companies carry similar weight and no single megacap steers the outcome. A rare flavor in a cohort built mostly on cap-weighted indexes.ftportfolios.com
  • The rules are written down, not left to a manager's judgment: absorb the first 10% of the underlying ETF's price decline over the stated outcome period, in exchange for an upside cap set at each period's start.ftportfolios.com
  • Expense ratio is 0.85%, right in line with what defined-outcome funds in its peer group charge for the same options plumbing.
  • June is one of three siblings on the same equal-weight reference (March and September round it out), so start dates can be laddered instead of hitched to one calendar.ftportfolios.com
  • RSSE Buffers the first 10% of losses on the price return of the equal-weight S&P 500 ETF, so the cushion sits on a broadly spread index rather than a handful of megacaps.
  • Fee of 0.85% a year, slightly under the middle of the buffer-ETF pack, and equal-weight defined-outcome funds are a small corner of that market.
  • One rung of a ladder: sibling fund RSJN runs the same equal-weight buffer strategy from a June start at the same 0.85% fee, so entry months can be staggered.

Worth knowing

  • RSJN The buffer is paid for with a ceiling: gains in the underlying ETF above the period's cap don't come through. Terms also reset each June, so entering mid-period changes your effective cap and remaining buffer.ftportfolios.com
  • The target is price return on the underlying ETF, held via FLEX options, so dividends from those 500 companies are not passed through. Income is not part of the design.ftportfolios.com
  • Trading is light next to the biggest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than with a mega-cap-index product.
  • RSSE Upside is capped. The cap is reset each September for the new outcome period, so gains beyond it in the reference index do not pass through.
  • Small asset base and light trading, so spreads can run wider than in the largest buffer funds. Buying mid-period also changes the buffer and cap actually in play.
  • Launched in 2024, so the track record is short, and the options structure is built to shape returns rather than pay income.

Full RSJN profile⁠

Full RSSE profile⁠

RSJN vs RSSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RSJN vs RSSE Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,199

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RSJN 0.85%

    $16,199

  • RSSE 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RSJN 0.85%
  • RSSE 0.85%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530RSJN $16,199RSSE $16,199

Year by year

YearRSJNRSSE
10$1,508$1,508
20$5,706$5,706
30$16,199$16,199

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%RSJN
  • 0.85%RSSE
  • Middle half of Other Buffered funds
  • Median 0.85%

RSJN 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

RSSE 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

RSJN vs RSSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
RSJN None
RSSE None

Distribution history

RSJNAll RSJN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RSSEAll RSSE payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RSJN vs RSSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RSJN 7.4%since Jul 2024RSSE 7.1%since Oct 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RSJN 0.84since Jul 2024RSSE 0.67since Oct 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RSJN −12.4%since Jun 2024RSSE −11.4%since Sep 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RSJN 0.49RSSE 0.44

RSJN and RSSE in the news

Popular comparisons

  • RSJNBvsKBFRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSECvsKBFRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSJNBvsTBJLB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June · Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSECvsTBJLB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September · Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSJNBvsIBUFB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June · Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSECvsIBUFB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September · Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.