TBJL ranks 2nd and RSSE 5th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.
RSSE vs TBJL
TBJL −0.06pt a year
0.85%0.79%
TBJL 1.2×the volume
9.94K12.2K
RSSE vs TBJL Performance
+13.9%−6.0%
- RSSE 0.85%
- TBJL 0.79%, better
- RSSE $35M
- TBJL $9M
- RSSE +13.9%, better
- TBJL −6.0%
- RSSE 3
- TBJL 3
- RSSE 9.94K sh
- TBJL 12.2K sh, better
- RSSE $23.93
- TBJL $19.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RSSE | TBJL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A75Higher |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | D38 | |
| Durability | B67Higher | B61 |
Rank among Other Buffered funds
Same Category. RSSE and TBJL are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RSSEC
TBJLB
In short
RSSE Most buffer ETFs bolt their downside cushion onto the megacap-heavy S&P 500. This one uses the equal-weight version instead, buffering the first 10% of losses over a one-year outcome period that resets every September.
TBJL Buffer ETFs almost always wrap the S&P 500. This one wraps long-dated Treasuries, absorbing the first 9% of a 12-month price decline in exchange for a cap that resets every July. Duration risk with guardrails.
Stated mandate
RSSE The Fund seeks returns matching the price return of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF, up to a predetermined cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses during the current outcome period.
TBJL The fund seeks to track the price return of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), subject to a 52.27% upside cap and protection against the first 9% of losses during the stated annual outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RSSE vs TBJL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RSSE vs TBJL Cost
Overpaying RSSE vs TBJL
$1,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RSSE 0.85%
$16,199
TBJL 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RSSE | TBJL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,405 | $103 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,331 | $375 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $15,174 | $1,025 |
- 0.85%RSSE
- 0.79%TBJL, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Buffered funds
- Median 0.85%
TBJL cheapest of 9 funds
RSSE 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
RSSE vs TBJL Dividends
- RSSE None
- TBJL None
Distribution history
RSSE vs TBJL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RSSE 7.1%TBJL 9.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- RSSE 0.67TBJL −0.19
- Worst fall
- RSSE −11.4%TBJL −28.6%
- Market sensitivity
- RSSE 0.44TBJL 0.41
RSSE and TBJL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
