KOMP ranks 2nd and LOUP 17th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
KOMP vs LOUP
KOMP −0.50pt a year
0.20%0.70%
KOMP 4.8×the volume
68.9K14.4K
LOUP +4.2pt
−0.4%+3.8%
KOMP vs LOUP Performance
−1.9%+20.3%
- KOMP 0.20%, better
- LOUP 0.70%
- KOMP $2.39B
- LOUP $165M
- KOMP +1.6%, better
- LOUP −10.5%
- KOMP 1.63%
- LOUP
- KOMP 501
- LOUP 31
- KOMP 68.9K sh, better
- LOUP 14.4K sh
- KOMP $60.11
- LOUP $67.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KOMP | LOUP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | C40 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B58Higher | F23 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | B60 |
| Durability | A89Higher | A74 |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. KOMP and LOUP are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KOMPA
LOUPC
In short
KOMP Most thematic funds bet on one idea. KOMP buys the whole Fourth Industrial Revolution: 20-plus Kensho subsectors, from robotics to genetic engineering, spread across roughly 500 global stocks for 0.20% a year.
LOUP A concentrated take on frontier tech: roughly 30 actively picked names measured against Innovator's own Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. One of the earlier disruptive-innovation ETFs, and still one of the smaller ones.
Stated mandate
KOMP The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index.
LOUP The actively managed ETF seeks to invest at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of companies developing new technologies, referred to as Frontier Tech Companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KOMP vs LOUP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KOMP vs LOUP Cost
Overpaying LOUP vs KOMP
$9,451
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KOMP 0.20%
$4,155
LOUP 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KOMP | LOUP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,250 | $885 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $4,760 | $3,339 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $13,606 | $9,451 |
- 0.20%KOMP, cheaper
- 0.70%LOUP
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
KOMP cheapest of 30 funds
LOUP 19th cheapest of 30 funds
KOMP vs LOUP Dividends
- KOMP 1.63%
- LOUP
- KOMP $1.02
- LOUP None
- KOMP $0.13
- LOUP
- KOMP Sep 21, 2026
- LOUP
- KOMP Sep 23, 2026
- LOUP
- KOMP Quarterly
- LOUP
Distribution history
KOMP vs LOUP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KOMP
- LOUP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KOMP 22.3%, betterLOUP 32.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- KOMP 0.76LOUP 0.84, better
- Worst fall
- KOMP −45.0%, betterLOUP −55.5%
- Market sensitivity
- KOMP 1.65LOUP 2.04
KOMP and LOUP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

