TRFM ranks 3rd and LOUP 17th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
LOUP vs TRFM
TRFM −0.21pt a year
0.70%0.49%
TRFM 2.9×the volume
14.4K42.3K
TRFM +1.8pt
+24.3%+26.1%
LOUP vs TRFM Performance
−10.5%+8.4%
- LOUP 0.70%
- TRFM 0.49%, better
- LOUP $165M
- TRFM $291M
- LOUP −10.5%
- TRFM +8.4%, better
- LOUP 31
- TRFM 266
- LOUP 14.4K sh
- TRFM 42.3K sh, better
- LOUP $67.19
- TRFM $50.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LOUP | TRFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A81Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F23 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | A88Higher |
| Durability | A74Higher | C52 |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. LOUP and TRFM are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LOUPC
TRFMA
In short
LOUP A concentrated take on frontier tech: roughly 30 actively picked names measured against Innovator's own Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. One of the earlier disruptive-innovation ETFs, and still one of the smaller ones.
TRFM Most disruption funds buy the story. TRFM screens for companies actually writing R&D checks, then spreads the theme across a couple hundred US-listed names instead of a concentrated bet on thirty.
Stated mandate
LOUP The actively managed ETF seeks to invest at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of companies developing new technologies, referred to as Frontier Tech Companies.
TRFM The Fund passively tracks the total return of the Pence Transformers Index before fees and expenses. The index targets U.S.-listed equity securities of companies positioned to benefit from significant changes in consumer behavior and technological innovation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LOUP vs TRFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LOUP vs TRFM Cost
Overpaying LOUP vs TRFM
$3,814
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LOUP 0.70%
$13,606
TRFM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LOUP | TRFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $883 | $367 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $3,394 | $1,366 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $9,792 | $3,814 |
- 0.70%LOUP
- 0.49%TRFM, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
TRFM 4th cheapest of 30 funds
LOUP 19th cheapest of 30 funds
LOUP vs TRFM Dividends
- LOUP None
- TRFM
- LOUP
- TRFM $0.08
- LOUP
- TRFM Dec 31, 2025
- LOUP
- TRFM Jan 5, 2026
- LOUP
- TRFM Irregular
Distribution history
LOUP vs TRFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LOUP 32.8%TRFM 23.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LOUP 0.84TRFM 1.03, better
- Worst fall
- LOUP −55.5%TRFM −28.4%
- Market sensitivity
- LOUP 2.04TRFM 1.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.