Skip to content

KOMP vs TMAT

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

KOMPANYSE Arca

Main Thematic Innovation ETF

TMATDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

KOMP −0.59pt a year

KOMP0.20%TMAT0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

KOMP 2.7×the volume

KOMP70KTMAT26.1K

5Y return · a year

TMAT +2.4pt

KOMP+0.6%TMAT+3.0%

KOMP vs TMAT Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+3.2%KOMP+16.0%TMAT

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. KOMP +3.2%. TMAT +16.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
KOMP 0.20%, better
TMAT 0.79%
Fund size
KOMP $2.57B
TMAT $242M
1Y total return
KOMP −1.6%, better
TMAT −4.3%
Yield (12M)
KOMP 1.63%, better
TMAT 0.02%
Holdings
KOMP 501
TMAT 86
Avg volume (30D)
KOMP 70K sh, better
TMAT 26.1K sh
NAV per share
KOMP $64.63
TMAT $27.29
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KOMP: Cost 100, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 88, Durability 88. TMAT: Cost 5, Risk 34, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings 73, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for KOMP, TMAT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKOMPTMAT
Cost30% weightA100HigherF5
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB55HigherD34
Tradability15% weightA77HigherB55
Holdings10% weightA88HigherA73
Durability5% weightA88HigherB59

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KOMP and TMAT are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

KOMP ranks 2nd and TMAT 28th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3ATRFMAAM Transformers ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 26DSPRXSpear Alpha ETFScore 34
  5. Rank 28DTMATMain Thematic Innovation ETFScore 33
  6. Rank 29DGGRWGabelli Growth Innovators ETFScore 28

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KOMPAState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

TMATDMain Thematic Innovation ETF

In short

KOMP Most thematic funds bet on one idea. KOMP buys the whole Fourth Industrial Revolution: 20-plus Kensho subsectors, from robotics to genetic engineering, spread across roughly 500 global stocks for 0.20% a year.

TMAT Most innovation ETFs pick one theme and ride it. TMAT picks the themes: an actively managed basket of theme ETFs that rotates between them, measured against a global stock benchmark rather than a single niche index.

Stated mandate

KOMP The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index.

TMAT The Fund seeks to outperform the MSCI ACWI Index in rising markets while limiting losses during declines. It pursues this through dynamic rotation among theme-based equity ETFs.

Why people hold it

  • KOMP 0.20% a year, under a third of the typical disruptive-innovation fund's fee and below peers like XT (0.46%) and TRFM (0.49%).
  • Kensho's language-processing engine scans regulatory filings for context and keywords, so membership rests on what a company discloses it does, not an old sector label.ssga.comspglobal.com
  • About 500 global names across 20-plus subsectors, equal weighted within each group with extra weight to 'core' operators. One mega-cap can't run the show.spglobal.com
  • Trading since 2018 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it sits among the strongest implementations in the disruptive-innovation group.
  • TMAT One ticker, many themes: instead of betting on robotics or genomics alone, it rotates among theme-based equity ETFs, so the manager, not you, decides which story carries the weight.
  • The stated job is asymmetry: aim to beat the MSCI ACWI Index in rising markets while limiting losses in declines. That is a global yardstick, not a narrow innovation index.
  • Actively managed with no index to hug, and it has been running since its 2021 launch through a full boom and bust in innovation stocks as a few-hundred-million-dollar fund.stockanalysis.com

Worth knowing

  • KOMP Equal weighting reaches down into smaller, earlier-stage innovators, so swings run wider than a plain broad-market index fund.spglobal.com
  • Subsector weights follow a risk-adjusted-return formula with annual reconstitution, so the mix drifts toward industries that have recently performed well.ssga.comspglobal.com
  • Breadth cuts both ways: a pure play on one theme like AI or space gets diluted here across the entire innovation map.spglobal.com
  • TMAT Fees run 0.79% net of a waiver through February 29, 2028 (0.82% gross), above the category median, and the theme ETFs it holds carry their own costs on top of that.
  • Cheaper index-based alternatives exist in the same aisle: KOMP charges 0.20% and XT 0.46%, both rules-based builds that pick one basket instead of rotating themes for you.
  • It trades lightly for its category, so spreads can be wider, and available disclosure does not let us verify how well the rise-more, fall-less goal has been met.

Full KOMP profile⁠

Full TMAT profile⁠

KOMP vs TMAT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KOMP vs TMAT Cost

Overpaying TMAT vs KOMP

$11,019

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KOMP 0.20%

    $4,155

  • TMAT 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KOMP 0.20%
  • TMAT 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TMAT $15,174KOMP $4,155

Year by year

YearKOMPTMATOverpaying
10$365$1,405$1,040
20$1,421$5,331$3,910
30$4,155$15,174$11,019

Expense ratio

  • 0.20%KOMP, cheaper
  • 0.79%TMAT
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

KOMP cheapest of 30 funds

TMAT 28th cheapest of 30 funds

KOMP vs TMAT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
KOMP 1.63%, better
TMAT 0.02%
Payout (12M)
KOMP $1.02
TMAT $0.005
Last payment
KOMP $0.13
TMAT $0.005
Ex-dividend
KOMP Sep 21, 2026
TMAT Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
KOMP Sep 23, 2026
TMAT Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
KOMP Quarterly
TMAT Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

KOMPQuarterly · 33 paymentsAll KOMP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 33 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2018 $0.04; Mar 18, 2019 $0.05; Jun 24, 2019 $0.03; Sep 23, 2019 $0.05; Dec 23, 2019 $0.11; Dec 30, 2019 $0.05; Mar 23, 2020 $0.06; Jun 22, 2020 $0.06; Sep 21, 2020 $0.07; Dec 21, 2020 $0.20; Mar 22, 2021 $0.22; Jun 21, 2021 $0.14; Sep 20, 2021 $0.13; Dec 20, 2021 $0.36; Mar 21, 2022 $0.08; Jun 21, 2022 $0.17; Sep 19, 2022 $0.17; Dec 19, 2022 $0.15; Mar 20, 2023 $0.10; Jun 20, 2023 $0.15; Sep 18, 2023 $0.12; Dec 18, 2023 $0.22; Mar 18, 2024 $0.08; Jun 24, 2024 $0.16; Sep 23, 2024 $0.10; Dec 23, 2024 $0.19; Mar 24, 2025 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.12; Sep 22, 2025 $0.14; Dec 22, 2025 $0.72; Mar 23, 2026 $0.07; Jun 22, 2026 $0.10; Sep 21, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
TMATIrregular · 5 paymentsAll TMAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2021 $0.02; Dec 22, 2021 $0.02; Jun 23, 2022 $0.0031; Dec 22, 2022 $0.04; Dec 23, 2025 $0.005. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

KOMP vs TMAT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • KOMP
  • TMAT
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: TMAT −51.9% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KOMP 22.3%, betterTMAT 28.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KOMP 0.76TMAT 0.88, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KOMP −45.4%, betterTMAT −51.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KOMP 1.65TMAT 1.83

KOMP and TMAT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • KOMPAvsXTA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMATDvsXTA

    Main Thematic Innovation ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KOMPAvsTRFMA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMATDvsTRFMA

    Main Thematic Innovation ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KOMPAvsXITKA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMATDvsXITKA

    Main Thematic Innovation ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.