KOMP ranks 2nd and TMAT 28th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
KOMP vs TMAT
KOMP −0.59pt a year
0.20%0.79%
KOMP 2.7×the volume
70K26.1K
TMAT +2.4pt
+0.6%+3.0%
KOMP vs TMAT Performance
+3.2%+16.0%
- KOMP 0.20%, better
- TMAT 0.79%
- KOMP $2.57B
- TMAT $242M
- KOMP −1.6%, better
- TMAT −4.3%
- KOMP 1.63%, better
- TMAT 0.02%
- KOMP 501
- TMAT 86
- KOMP 70K sh, better
- TMAT 26.1K sh
- KOMP $64.63
- TMAT $27.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KOMP | TMAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F5 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | A73 |
| Durability | A88Higher | B59 |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. KOMP and TMAT are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KOMPA
TMATD
In short
KOMP Most thematic funds bet on one idea. KOMP buys the whole Fourth Industrial Revolution: 20-plus Kensho subsectors, from robotics to genetic engineering, spread across roughly 500 global stocks for 0.20% a year.
TMAT Most innovation ETFs pick one theme and ride it. TMAT picks the themes: an actively managed basket of theme ETFs that rotates between them, measured against a global stock benchmark rather than a single niche index.
Stated mandate
KOMP The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index.
TMAT The Fund seeks to outperform the MSCI ACWI Index in rising markets while limiting losses during declines. It pursues this through dynamic rotation among theme-based equity ETFs.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KOMP vs TMAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KOMP vs TMAT Cost
Overpaying TMAT vs KOMP
$11,019
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KOMP 0.20%
$4,155
TMAT 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KOMP | TMAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,405 | $1,040 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $5,331 | $3,910 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $15,174 | $11,019 |
- 0.20%KOMP, cheaper
- 0.79%TMAT
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
KOMP cheapest of 30 funds
TMAT 28th cheapest of 30 funds
KOMP vs TMAT Dividends
- KOMP 1.63%, better
- TMAT 0.02%
- KOMP $1.02
- TMAT $0.005
- KOMP $0.13
- TMAT $0.005
- KOMP Sep 21, 2026
- TMAT Dec 23, 2025
- KOMP Sep 23, 2026
- TMAT Dec 29, 2025
- KOMP Quarterly
- TMAT Irregular
Distribution history
KOMP vs TMAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KOMP
- TMAT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KOMP 22.3%, betterTMAT 28.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- KOMP 0.76TMAT 0.88, better
- Worst fall
- KOMP −45.4%, betterTMAT −51.9%
- Market sensitivity
- KOMP 1.65TMAT 1.83
KOMP and TMAT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

