Skip to content
etf.net

KPO vs ROM

Kensington Premium Opportunities Etf

KPO—Cboe

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ROM −0.02pt a year

KPO0.95%ROM0.93%

Avg volume · 30D

ROM 2.9×the volume

KPO16.7KROM47.7K

KPO vs ROM Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−3.4%KPO−17.1%ROM

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. KPO −3.4%. ROM −17.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%5%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
KPO 0.95%
ROM 0.93%, better
Fund size
KPO $11M
ROM $1.15B
1Y total return
KPO No data
ROM +26.5%
Yield (12M)
KPO No data
ROM 0.03%
Holdings
KPO 7
ROM 85
Avg volume (30D)
KPO 16.7K sh
ROM 47.7K sh, better
NAV per share
KPO $24.01
ROM $132.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —KPONot yet graded
ROM: Cost 70, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings not scored, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for KPO, ROM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKPOROM
Cost30% weightNot scoredA70
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightNot scoredB56
Tradability15% weightNot scoredA88
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightNot scoredA81

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 77
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 71
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. KPONot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KPO—Kensington Premium Opportunities Etf

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

In short

KPO No data

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

Stated mandate

KPO No data

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

Why people hold it

KPO No data

  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com

Worth knowing

KPO No data

  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.

Full KPO profile⁠

Full ROM profile⁠

KPO vs ROM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KPO vs ROM Cost

Overpaying KPO vs ROM

$330

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KPO 0.95%

    $17,869

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KPO 0.95%
  • ROM 0.93%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KPO $17,869ROM $17,539

Year by year

YearKPOROMOverpaying
10$1,678$1,644$34
20$6,322$6,199$123
30$17,869$17,539$330

Expense ratio

  • 0.95%KPO
  • 0.93%ROM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

KPO 32nd cheapest of 95 funds

KPO vs ROM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
KPO No data
ROM 0.03%
Payout (12M)
KPO None
ROM $0.04
Last payment
KPO No data
ROM $0.02
Ex-dividend
KPO No data
ROM Mar 25, 2026
Paid on
KPO No data
ROM Mar 31, 2026
Frequency
KPO No data
ROM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

KPOAll KPO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ROMQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0015; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0075; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0064; Jun 20, 2018 $0.006; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2019 $0.01; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0042; Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.14; Sep 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

KPO vs ROM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KPO No dataROM 49.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KPO No dataROM 0.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KPO No dataROM −67.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KPO 0.00ROM 3.09

Popular comparisons

  • KPO—vsQLDA

    Kensington Premium Opportunities Etf · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • KPO—vsUYGA

    Kensington Premium Opportunities Etf · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • KPO—vsDDMB

    Kensington Premium Opportunities Etf · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.