SDOW ranks 2nd and LABD 14th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
LABD vs SDOW
SDOW −0.12pt a year
1.07%0.95%
LABD 4.9×the volume
18.8M3.85M
SDOW +20.9pt
−58.5%−37.6%
LABD vs SDOW Performance
−96.2%−73.1%
- LABD 1.07%
- SDOW 0.95%, better
- LABD $78M
- SDOW $154M
- LABD −74.3%
- SDOW −21.9%, better
- LABD 6.59%, better
- SDOW 4.76%
- LABD 6
- SDOW 10
- LABD 18.8M sh, better
- SDOW 3.85M sh
- LABD $6.74
- SDOW $25.01
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LABD | SDOW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | F15 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | F0 | |
| Durability | C46 | B67Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. LABD and SDOW are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LABDF
SDOWA
In short
LABD Biotech headlines cut both ways, and LABD takes the short side at triple speed: it aims for 300% of the inverse daily move in the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, reset every close.
SDOW The only -3x ETF pointed at the Dow. SDOW aims to deliver three times the inverse of the index's daily move, reset at each close, for 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
LABD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.
SDOW SDOW seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times the inverse of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LABD vs SDOW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LABD vs SDOW Cost
Overpaying LABD vs SDOW
$1,946
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LABD 1.07%
$19,815
SDOW 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LABD | SDOW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,881 | $1,678 | $203 |
| 20 | $7,046 | $6,322 | $724 |
| 30 | $19,815 | $17,869 | $1,946 |
- 1.07%LABD
- 0.95%SDOW, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SDOW 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
LABD 13th cheapest of 14 funds
LABD vs SDOW Dividends
- LABD 6.59%, better
- SDOW 4.76%
- LABD $0.46
- SDOW $1.19
- LABD $0.07
- SDOW $0.29
- LABD Sep 22, 2026
- SDOW Sep 23, 2026
- LABD Sep 29, 2026
- SDOW Sep 29, 2026
- LABD Quarterly
- SDOW Quarterly
Distribution history
LABD vs SDOW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LABD
- SDOW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LABD 68.2%SDOW 34.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LABD −1.36SDOW −1.22, better
- Worst fall
- LABD −99.2%SDOW −85.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LABD −3.12SDOW −2.46
Popular comparisons
- 1.07% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.