SQQQ ranks 1st and LABD 14th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
LABD vs SQQQ
SQQQ −0.13pt a year
1.07%0.94%
SQQQ 2.7×the volume
18.8M50M
SQQQ +4.2pt
−58.5%−54.3%
LABD vs SQQQ Performance
−96.2%−93.7%
- LABD 1.07%
- SQQQ 0.94%, better
- LABD $78M
- SQQQ $2.04B
- LABD −74.3%
- SQQQ −32.5%, better
- LABD 6.59%
- SQQQ 7.78%, better
- LABD 6
- SQQQ 12
- LABD 18.8M sh
- SQQQ 50M sh, better
- LABD $6.74
- SQQQ $41.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LABD | SQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | F15 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | C47 | |
| Durability | C46 | A73Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. LABD and SQQQ are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LABDF
SQQQA
In short
LABD Biotech headlines cut both ways, and LABD takes the short side at triple speed: it aims for 300% of the inverse daily move in the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, reset every close.
SQQQ The workhorse of the short-Nasdaq trade. Running since 2010, it aims at three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100's daily move, resets every session, and charges 0.94% a year, below the going rate in the 3x bear category.
Stated mandate
LABD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.
SQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100 Index’s daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LABD vs SQQQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LABD vs SQQQ Cost
Overpaying LABD vs SQQQ
$2,111
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LABD 1.07%
$19,815
SQQQ 0.94%
$17,704
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LABD | SQQQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,881 | $1,661 | $220 |
| 20 | $7,046 | $6,260 | $786 |
| 30 | $19,815 | $17,704 | $2,111 |
- 1.07%LABD
- 0.94%SQQQ, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SQQQ cheapest of 14 funds
LABD 13th cheapest of 14 funds
LABD vs SQQQ Dividends
- LABD 6.59%
- SQQQ 7.78%, better
- LABD $0.46
- SQQQ $3.25
- LABD $0.07
- SQQQ $0.47
- LABD Sep 22, 2026
- SQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- LABD Sep 29, 2026
- SQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- LABD Quarterly
- SQQQ Quarterly
Distribution history
LABD vs SQQQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LABD
- SQQQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LABD 68.2%SQQQ 48.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LABD −1.36, betterSQQQ −1.42
- Worst fall
- LABD −99.2%SQQQ −97.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LABD −3.12SQQQ −3.43
Popular comparisons
- 1.07% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.