SRTY ranks 3rd and LABD 14th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
LABD vs SRTY
SRTY −0.12pt a year
1.07%0.95%
LABD 11.7×the volume
18.8M1.6M
SRTY +15.7pt
−58.5%−42.8%
LABD vs SRTY Performance
−96.2%−82.0%
- LABD 1.07%
- SRTY 0.95%, better
- LABD $78M
- SRTY $68M
- LABD −74.3%
- SRTY −37.4%, better
- LABD 6.59%, better
- SRTY 5.87%
- LABD 6
- SRTY 5
- LABD 18.8M sh, better
- SRTY 1.6M sh
- LABD $6.74
- SRTY $26.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LABD | SRTY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | F15 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C46 | B56Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. LABD and SRTY are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LABDF
SRTYA
In short
LABD Biotech headlines cut both ways, and LABD takes the short side at triple speed: it aims for 300% of the inverse daily move in the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, reset every close.
SRTY A one-day instrument by design: SRTY aims for three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and it has been the ProShares small-cap bear since 2010.
Stated mandate
LABD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.
SRTY SRTY seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LABD vs SRTY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LABD vs SRTY Cost
Overpaying LABD vs SRTY
$1,946
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LABD 1.07%
$19,815
SRTY 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LABD | SRTY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,881 | $1,678 | $203 |
| 20 | $7,046 | $6,322 | $724 |
| 30 | $19,815 | $17,869 | $1,946 |
- 1.07%LABD
- 0.95%SRTY, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SRTY 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
LABD 13th cheapest of 14 funds
LABD vs SRTY Dividends
- LABD 6.59%, better
- SRTY 5.87%
- LABD $0.46
- SRTY $1.55
- LABD $0.07
- SRTY $0.27
- LABD Sep 22, 2026
- SRTY Sep 23, 2026
- LABD Sep 29, 2026
- SRTY Sep 29, 2026
- LABD Quarterly
- SRTY Quarterly
Distribution history
LABD vs SRTY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LABD
- SRTY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LABD 68.2%SRTY 54.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LABD −1.36SRTY −1.04, better
- Worst fall
- LABD −99.2%SRTY −92.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LABD −3.12SRTY −3.24
Popular comparisons
- 1.07% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.