Skip to content

LABD vs TZA

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF

LABDFNYSE Arca

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF

TZABNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

TZA −0.08pt a year

LABD1.07%TZA0.99%

Avg volume · 30D

LABD 1.1×the volume

LABD18.8MTZA17.8M

10Y return · a year

TZA +16.7pt

LABD−58.5%TZA−41.8%

LABD vs TZA Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−96.2%LABD−79.9%TZA

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. LABD −96.2%. TZA −79.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%50%100%150%200%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LABD 1.07%
TZA 0.99%, better
Fund size
LABD $78M
TZA $191M
1Y total return
LABD −74.3%
TZA −37.2%, better
Yield (12M)
LABD 6.59%, better
TZA 4.06%
Holdings
LABD 6
TZA 7
Avg volume (30D)
LABD 18.8M sh, better
TZA 17.8M sh
NAV per share
LABD $6.74
TZA $44.49
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LABD: Cost 5, Risk 15, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 46. TZA: Cost 64, Risk 54, Mission 75, Tradability 63, Holdings not scored, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for LABD, TZA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLABDTZA
Cost30% weightF5B64Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA75
Risk15% weightF15C54Higher
Tradability15% weightC46B63Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC46B60Higher

Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LABD and TZA are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

3x Leveraged Inverse⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

TZA ranks 4th and LABD 14th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.

  1. Rank 1ASQQQProShares UltraPro Short QQQScore 83
  2. Rank 2ASDOWProShares UltraPro Short Dow30Score 78
  3. Rank 3ASRTYProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000Score 71
  4. Rank 4BTZADirexion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 5BSOXSDirexion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 13FWEBSDirexion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X ETFScore 22
  7. Rank 14FLABDDirexion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETFScore 19

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LABDFDirexion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF

TZABDirexion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF

In short

LABD Biotech headlines cut both ways, and LABD takes the short side at triple speed: it aims for 300% of the inverse daily move in the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, reset every close.

TZA Born in the wreckage of 2008, TZA aims to move three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily swing. A heavily traded way to press a bearish small-cap view, with a daily reset that makes it a tool for days, not quarters.

Stated mandate

LABD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.

TZA The Fund seeks daily inverse leveraged investment results equal to negative three times the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index. Its leverage makes it potentially riskier than nonleveraged alternatives.

Why people hold it

  • LABD One ticker, no margin account and no borrowing shares, for a bearish biotech view: the fund targets 300% of the index's inverse daily return, before fees and expenses.direxion.com
  • The underlying S&P Select Industry index is equal or capped market-cap weighted, so clinical-stage small caps carry weight alongside big names and sector news hits harder.spglobal.com
  • 1.07% a year (1.08% gross, net of a waiver through September 1, 2027) sits near the typical 3x bear fee, above SQQQ at 0.94% and SOXS at 1.00%.
  • Listed in 2015 and traded actively since, through several biotech boom-and-bust stretches, so there is a long intraday record to study.
  • TZA Fee of 0.99% comes in under the typical leveraged bear fund, and under every other Russell 2000 short ETF on the shelf (RWM, TWM, SRTY).
  • Very actively traded, which usually means tight spreads and easy exits when a short-term view changes fast.
  • Running since 2008, a long life for a leveraged fund, and it has stayed close to its stated daily target.
  • Sits in the upper half of a crowded leveraged bear peer group on our overall read.

Worth knowing

  • LABD Daily reset: the stated objective covers one day only, and over longer holds compounding can push results well away from -3x the index move, especially in choppy tape.direxion.com
  • Triple inverse on one of the market's twitchiest sectors means losses stack up fast on biotech rallies; the structure assumes active, hands-on monitoring.direxion.com
  • Across our 3x bear review group it lands in the lower tier, mostly on cost and the volatility baked into its underlying sector.
  • TZA The -3x target resets every day. Hold longer and compounding pulls results away from three times the index move over that stretch, up or down.
  • Triple leverage cuts both ways: a 1% up day in the Russell 2000 is roughly a 3% down day here, before costs.
  • Direxion's own filing flags the fund as potentially riskier than nonleveraged alternatives and built for daily monitoring.

Full LABD profile⁠

Full TZA profile⁠

LABD vs TZA Holdings

How LABD and TZA differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of LABD and 0.0% of TZA.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classLeveraged/Inverse100%

Sector

No Sector split for LABD and TZA.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for LABD and TZA.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • LABD137.3%
  • TZA159.7%

Securities held

  • LABD0
  • TZA0

Asset class

LABD
Leveraged/Inverse
TZA
Leveraged/Inverse

Holdings

  • Only in LABD0
  • In both0
  • Only in TZA0

Only in LABD

0 securities, 0.0% of LABD by weight

Only in TZA

0 securities, 0.0% of TZA by weight

Weight gaps

LABD and TZA share no securities.

All 11 LABD holdings⁠All 12 TZA holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LABD vs TZA Cost

Overpaying LABD vs TZA

$1,290

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LABD 1.07%

    $19,815

  • TZA 0.99%

    $18,525

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LABD 1.07%
  • TZA 0.99%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530LABD $19,815TZA $18,525

Year by year

YearLABDTZAOverpaying
10$1,881$1,746$135
20$7,046$6,565$481
30$19,815$18,525$1,290

Expense ratio

  • 1.07%LABD
  • 0.99%TZA, cheaper
  • Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
  • Median 1.02%

TZA 5th cheapest of 14 funds

LABD 13th cheapest of 14 funds

LABD vs TZA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LABD 6.59%, better
TZA 4.06%
Payout (12M)
LABD $0.46
TZA $1.90
Last payment
LABD $0.07
TZA $0.47
Ex-dividend
LABD Sep 22, 2026
TZA Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
LABD Sep 29, 2026
TZA Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
LABD Quarterly
TZA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

LABDQuarterly · 25 paymentsAll LABD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 25 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2018 $8.88; Jun 19, 2018 $4.88; Sep 25, 2018 $17.16; Dec 27, 2018 $38.27; Mar 19, 2019 $11.29; Jun 25, 2019 $17.48; Sep 24, 2019 $11.71; Dec 23, 2019 $2.78; Mar 24, 2020 $9.95; Dec 20, 2022 $0.92; Mar 21, 2023 $2.18; Jun 21, 2023 $1.00; Sep 19, 2023 $1.92; Dec 21, 2023 $0.85; Mar 19, 2024 $0.66; Jun 25, 2024 $0.89; Sep 24, 2024 $0.58; Dec 23, 2024 $1.26; Mar 25, 2025 $0.55; Jun 24, 2025 $0.37; Sep 23, 2025 $0.26; Dec 23, 2025 $0.23; Mar 24, 2026 $0.09; Jun 23, 2026 $0.08; Sep 22, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$25202020232026YTD
TZAQuarterly · 21 paymentsAll TZA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 21 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2018 $6.00; Sep 25, 2018 $12.00; Dec 27, 2018 $20.23; Mar 19, 2019 $2.16; Sep 24, 2019 $26.07; Dec 23, 2019 $7.17; Mar 21, 2023 $4.60; Jun 21, 2023 $2.36; Sep 19, 2023 $2.88; Dec 21, 2023 $1.11; Mar 19, 2024 $2.36; Jun 25, 2024 $2.33; Sep 24, 2024 $1.47; Dec 23, 2024 $0.84; Mar 25, 2025 $2.38; Jun 24, 2025 $0.56; Sep 23, 2025 $0.53; Dec 23, 2025 $0.34; Mar 24, 2026 $0.71; Jun 23, 2026 $0.38; Sep 22, 2026 $0.47. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$25202020232026YTD

LABD vs TZA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • LABD
  • TZA
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: LABD −99.2% · Aug 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−100%−75%−50%−25%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LABD 68.2%TZA 53.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LABD −1.36TZA −1.01, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LABD −99.2%TZA −92.1%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LABD −3.12TZA −3.25

Popular comparisons

  • LABDFvsSQQQA

    Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF · ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

    Expense ratio
    1.07% · 0.94%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TZABvsSQQQA

    Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF · ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.94%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LABDFvsSDOWA

    Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF · ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

    Expense ratio
    1.07% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TZABvsSDOWA

    Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF · ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LABDFvsSRTYA

    Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF · ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000

    Expense ratio
    1.07% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TZABvsSRTYA

    Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF · ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.